2006
DOI: 10.1007/s00284-005-0266-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Real-Time PCR Detection of the Effects of Protozoa on Rumen Bacteria in Cattle

Abstract: A real-time PCR approach was used in this study to clarify the populations of major bacterial species in the rumens of faunated and unfaunated cattle. The sensitivity of this novel real-time PCR assay was evaluated by using 10(1) to 10(8) plasmid copies of target bacteria. The numbers of plasmid copies of Ruminococcus albus, Ruminococcus flavefaciens, Prevotella ruminicola, and the CUR-E cluster were higher in the unfaunated than in the faunated rumens. The CUR-E cluster belongs to the Clostridium group. In co… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
27
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
4
27
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In the present study, we chose absolute quantification of 16S rDNA gene copies of each bacterial species to reflect the quantity of bacterial populations over a 24 h in vitro incubation. The 16S rDNA gene copy numbers derived in this study are comparable to values reported for ruminal rumen samples from sheep and cattle,29, 31 suggesting that the real‐time PCR assays employed in this study yielded representative assessments of the direct (i.e., PT actions on individual species) and indirect (i.e., interactions among species yielding alterations in defined metabolic groups, such as cellulolytic versus non‐cellulolytic) effects on rumen bacteria.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the present study, we chose absolute quantification of 16S rDNA gene copies of each bacterial species to reflect the quantity of bacterial populations over a 24 h in vitro incubation. The 16S rDNA gene copy numbers derived in this study are comparable to values reported for ruminal rumen samples from sheep and cattle,29, 31 suggesting that the real‐time PCR assays employed in this study yielded representative assessments of the direct (i.e., PT actions on individual species) and indirect (i.e., interactions among species yielding alterations in defined metabolic groups, such as cellulolytic versus non‐cellulolytic) effects on rumen bacteria.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…Despite its inability to differentiate live and dead bacteria, this real‐time PCR technique has been used by other researchers to measure rumen bacterial growth 29, 30. In the present study, we chose absolute quantification of 16S rDNA gene copies of each bacterial species to reflect the quantity of bacterial populations over a 24 h in vitro incubation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, it is widely accepted that a decrease (or elimination) of rumen protozoa increases bacterial concentration, MN flow, and EMPS (Eugène et al, 2004b;Ozutsumi et al, 2006), either because the ecological niche is occupied by bacteria, or because of the predatory effect of protozoa. In general, it is widely accepted that a decrease (or elimination) of rumen protozoa increases bacterial concentration, MN flow, and EMPS (Eugène et al, 2004b;Ozutsumi et al, 2006), either because the ecological niche is occupied by bacteria, or because of the predatory effect of protozoa.…”
Section: Efficiency Of Microbial Synthesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fibrobacter succinogenes , Ruminococcus albus , and Ruminococcus flavefaciens are presently recognized as the major cellulolytic bacterial species found in the rumen [5], [6]. The presence or absence of rumen ciliate protozoa is reported to be associated with changes in the composition of the bacterial population [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%