2018
DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.can-18-0270
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reciprocal Regulation of DUSP9 and DUSP16 Expression by HIF1 Controls ERK and p38 MAP Kinase Activity and Mediates Chemotherapy-Induced Breast Cancer Stem Cell Enrichment

Abstract: Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) has a poor prognosis due to its aggressive characteristics and lack of targeted therapies. Cytotoxic chemotherapy may reduce tumor bulk, but leaves residual disease due to the persistence of chemotherapy-resistant breast cancer stem cells (BCSC), which are critical for tumor recurrence and metastasis. Here, we demonstrate that hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF)-1-dependent regulation of mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling pathways contributes to chemotherapy-induc… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
83
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(91 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
4
83
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, tumor cells undergoing a stress response independent of enzalutamide or prostate cancer may also rely on p38 activation to persist and survive in ecologically-unfavorable environments, such as the hostile environment of the bloodstream during dissemination, or during treatments that target other oncogenic drivers across different cancer types. For example, p38 activity has been shown in both breast and lung cancer to promote chemotherapy resistance (Flem-Karlsen et al, 2019; Liu et al, 2016; Lu et al, 2018). Activation of p38 has also been linked to DNA repair (Canovas et al, 2018), which is also enriched in our models of enzalutamide resistance (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, tumor cells undergoing a stress response independent of enzalutamide or prostate cancer may also rely on p38 activation to persist and survive in ecologically-unfavorable environments, such as the hostile environment of the bloodstream during dissemination, or during treatments that target other oncogenic drivers across different cancer types. For example, p38 activity has been shown in both breast and lung cancer to promote chemotherapy resistance (Flem-Karlsen et al, 2019; Liu et al, 2016; Lu et al, 2018). Activation of p38 has also been linked to DNA repair (Canovas et al, 2018), which is also enriched in our models of enzalutamide resistance (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is also important to note that chemotherapeutic agent when encounter a hypoxic condition could diversely cause CSC enrichment through regulation mitogen‐activated protein kinase signaling. This regulation is mediated by the inhibition of ERK and activation of p38 signaling for respective induction and stabilization of pluripotency factors in the CSCs (Lu et al, ). Radiotherapy also indirectly induces expression of HIF‐1α (X. Chen et al, ).…”
Section: Csc Targeting In Cancer Therapymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hypoxia is known as a common feature of the TME (Lan et al, 2018) that is induced diversely after treatment with chemo/radiotherapy (Dianat-Moghadam et al, 2018). Hypoxia is associated with F I G U R E 5 Targeting cancer stem cells (CSCs) for cancer therapies.…”
Section: Modalities To Overcome Chemo-and/or Radioresistance Of Cscsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In similar contexts, KLF4‐miR‐206 signaling, which suppressed pro‐apoptotic PDCD4 and CX43, was essential for the survival of CSC cells derived from established TNBC cell lines as well as in PROCR + /ESA + /ALDH + CSC‐like cells derived from C3(1)/Tag basal/TNBC tumors . KLF4 was also found to play supporting roles in the propagation of CSCs in resurging TNBC growths following chemotherapy administration . Our findings that LINC01133 plays critical upstream regulatory roles of KLF4 expression, together with its enrichment in lineage‐negative CSC‐rich breast tumors (Supporting Information Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 53%