2014
DOI: 10.1186/1746-1596-9-29
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Red blood cell distribution width is not correlated with preeclampsia among pregnant Sudanese women

Abstract: BackgroundPreeclampsia is a leading cause of maternal and perinatal mortality worldwide. The exact etiology of preeclampsia is unknown, but the inflammatory process is postulated as one of the etiologies. Red blood cell distribution width (RDW) is a measure of anisocytosis (variation of red cell size) and is associated with hypertension and diabetic ketoacidosis. There are few data on the association between RDW and preeclampsia. This study aimed to investigate the association between RDW and preeclampsia.Meth… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

6
32
2
11

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
6
32
2
11
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast to the literature, we did not observe any increase in Hct and any decrease in PLT, especially in severe form of preeclampsia, despite we expected to see (14,43). Conflicting results may be mainly due to the small number of subjects in severe and mild preeclampsia groups.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 55%
“…In contrast to the literature, we did not observe any increase in Hct and any decrease in PLT, especially in severe form of preeclampsia, despite we expected to see (14,43). Conflicting results may be mainly due to the small number of subjects in severe and mild preeclampsia groups.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 55%
“…In Sudan, several aspects of preeclampsia were investigated (1923); however, there were no published data on thyroid function/antibodies in preeclamptic patients. This study aimed to investigate thyroid function (TSH, free T3, and free T4)/antibodies (anti-TPO and anti-TG) in patients with preeclampsia.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the contrary, Abdullahi et al including 65 cases and controls matched in their basic characteristics found no difference in the mean (SD) RDW-CV between women with preeclampsia and controls (14.5% ± 1.8 vs. 14.4% ± 1.4, P = 0.710). In this study, there was also no difference in the mean RDW between women with mild and severe preeclampsia (14.7% ± 1.9 vs. 13.9% ± 1.4, P = 0.144) and, in logistic regression, there was no association between RDW and preeclampsia (OR = 0.9, 95% CI = 0.7 - 1.1, P = 0.952) ( 21 ). Overall, these findings suggest that RDW may be increased in preeclampsia, especially in severe cases, but such an increase remains to be better quantified, and evaluated in terms of clinical applicability, given the fragmented data reported on the sensitivity, specificity and other diagnostic accuracy parameters of RDW in the studies published so far.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 58%