2018
DOI: 10.1007/s00170-018-1681-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reducing deformation, stress, and tool wear during milling processes using simulation-based multiobjective optimization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The parameter ranges for P and s were taken as [20 W, 100 W] and [2 mm, 3 mm], respectively. The lower and upper limits of v are defined by v lb and v ub (see Equations (19) and 20), respectively. Thus, the range of v is different at distinct values of P and s and, as a consequence, the optimization search space is not a cube.…”
Section: Optimization Of a Laser-based Materials Accumulation Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The parameter ranges for P and s were taken as [20 W, 100 W] and [2 mm, 3 mm], respectively. The lower and upper limits of v are defined by v lb and v ub (see Equations (19) and 20), respectively. Thus, the range of v is different at distinct values of P and s and, as a consequence, the optimization search space is not a cube.…”
Section: Optimization Of a Laser-based Materials Accumulation Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By selecting this process window, constructed around the area where experiments suggested an energy efficient process, we restrict our optimization methodology to a relatively small input domain, allowing for a higher precision. We also avoid including solutions far away from the interesting non-linear search space defined by equations (19) and (20) that might potentially mislead the construction of the metamodels.…”
Section: Optimization Of a Laser-based Materials Accumulation Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations