Reviews of intelligence failures have recommended greater use of external expertise in challenging intelligence community assessments. External contributions were expected to augment covert collection and to provide open source challenge to analysts, rather than to directly contribute to decision support. The structural limitations of the scope and machinery of intelligence have limited the value agencies can extract from external experts. Creating an Open Source Intelligence Agency of commensurate size to primary intelligence organisations would enable decision support to be provided to all government departments. It would widen the pool of sources and experts, providing for greater extraction of value from experts who are only partially included in this government activity.2 Eldridge et al, 'Fusing Algorithms', 392.3 Hulnick described OSINT as peculiarly effective as a tool for early warning: Hulnick, 'The Dilemma of OSINT', p.232. 4 The over-reading of the new-ness of globalisation is effectively rebutted by Justin Rosenberg. Rosenberg, 'Globalisation Theory', pp450-482. Marret is credited with coining the term 'glocal' in relation to Al-Qaeda: Marret, 'Al-Qaeda', 543. 5 Barber, Jihad vs McWorld. 6 Mahbubani, Has China Won?. 7 Davies and Gustasfson, 'Complexity, Uncertainty ', pp.1-20. 8 Whilst Steven Stollemyre discusses automated forms of crowdsourcing for intelligence, my argument here could be seen to align to Stolleymyre's broad argument. 'Solleymyre, HUMINT, OSINT or Something New?', p.580. 9 Peter Gill makes a persuasive case for the role of intelligence during and after the pandemic: Gill, 'Intelligence Oversight', p.15. 10 UK Parliament, 'COVID-19'. 11 UK Parliament, 'COVID-19'.