2022
DOI: 10.1101/2022.10.13.511885
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Refphase: Multi-sample reference phasing reveals haplotype-specific copy number heterogeneity

Abstract: Most computational methods that infer somatic copy number alterations (SCNAs) from bulk sequencing of DNA analyse tumour samples individually. However, the sequencing of multiple tumour samples from a patient's disease is an increasingly common practice. We introduce Refphase, an algorithm that leverages this multi-sampling approach to infer haplotype-specific copy numbers through multi-sample reference phasing. We demonstrate Refphase's ability to infer haplotype-specific SCNAs and characterise their intra-tu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
(107 reference statements)
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Mirrored-subclonal CNAs are differential gains or losses of the maternal and paternal chromosomes in different subpopulations of cancer cells from the same tumor. In contrast to earlier reports of mirrored-subclonal allelic imbalance [39,[48][49][50] in bulk samples, HATCHet2 identifies haplotype imbalance in specific clones. We show using simulated data that HATCHet2 accurately identifies mirrored-subclonal CNAs (Additional file 1: Section S9).…”
Section: Identification Of Clone-specific Mirrored-subclonal Cnasmentioning
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Mirrored-subclonal CNAs are differential gains or losses of the maternal and paternal chromosomes in different subpopulations of cancer cells from the same tumor. In contrast to earlier reports of mirrored-subclonal allelic imbalance [39,[48][49][50] in bulk samples, HATCHet2 identifies haplotype imbalance in specific clones. We show using simulated data that HATCHet2 accurately identifies mirrored-subclonal CNAs (Additional file 1: Section S9).…”
Section: Identification Of Clone-specific Mirrored-subclonal Cnasmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…We refer to such events as mirrored-subclonal CNAs because the more-abundant haplotype is opposite ("mirrored") between the two clones. Previous efforts to detect these events have been limited to the identification of mirrored-subclonal allelic imbalance [39,[48][49][50], a sample-level rather than clone-level feature, in which the more abundant haplotype on average in a sample is different between samples. This analysis treated samples as homogeneous and did not identify haplotype-specific copy-number states nor assign them to specific tumor clones.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mirrored-subclonal CNAs are differential gains or losses of the maternal and paternal chromosomes in different subpopulations of cancer cells from the same tumor. In contrast to earlier reports of mirroredsubclonal allelic imbalance [41,[50][51][52] in bulk samples, HATCHet2 identifies haplotype imbalance in specific clones. Our HATCHet2 analysis of the 10 prostate cancer patients from [44] reveals numerous mirrored-subclonal CNAs that were missed in both the original published analysis of these patients [44] as well as in the reanalysis using HATCHet [32].…”
Section: Identification Of Clone-specific Mirrored-subclonal Cnasmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…The mhBAF is also a more robust estimator of mirroredsubclonal CNAs, compared to earlier approaches [25,41,51,52] that identify imbalanced segments that differ across samples in a post-hoc analysis. These methods are unable to detect regions of mirrored-subclonal allelic imbalance that are not identified by the input segmentation.…”
Section: Mirrored Haplotype B-allele Frequency (Mhbaf)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation