2012
DOI: 10.1117/1.jmm.11.1.013001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relationship between localized wafer shape changes induced by residual stress and overlay errors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We examine the validity of this assumption by using full scale three-dimensional (3-D) FE models, as described in detail elsewhere. 9,10 Wafer shape measurements were made of silicon wafers at two lithography steps in the process flow. The thickness of the 300-mm wafer was assumed to be uniform with a nominal value of 775 μm.…”
Section: Relationship Between Wafer Geometry Andmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We examine the validity of this assumption by using full scale three-dimensional (3-D) FE models, as described in detail elsewhere. 9,10 Wafer shape measurements were made of silicon wafers at two lithography steps in the process flow. The thickness of the 300-mm wafer was assumed to be uniform with a nominal value of 775 μm.…”
Section: Relationship Between Wafer Geometry Andmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This has changed as overlay error budgets have been reduced to the sub-10 nm regime. Several papers examining aspects of process induced overlay errors have been published in the past 5 years (e.g., [2,4,5]). In 2012, our team demonstrated that if a deposited film has a uniform residual stress that does not vary with location on the wafer then the induced distortions can be fully compensated for through the application of standard linear corrections in the scanner [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If wafers are not chucked completely, overlay and defocus issues may arise in lithography processes. [1][2][3] While wafer chucking is not typically considered a key challenge, recent and future changes to lithography systems and processes have increased the importance of wafer chucking. These changes include: (1) the development of EUV lithography systems that use electrostatic chucks with lower clamping pressures, (2) a move to smaller feature sizes with tighter requirements on defocus and overlay that make complete chucking, down to the nanometer level, critical, and (3) a transition to larger diameter, 450-mm wafers that are thicker and thus stiffer and more difficult to chuck.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%