2006
DOI: 10.1080/02705060.2006.9664990
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relationships between Fine Sediment and Brook TroutRecruitment in Forested Headwater Streams

Abstract: We examined the influence and relative importance of fine sediment on wild brook trout (Salvelinus fontinalis) populations in a forested watershed. Brook trout spawning substrate was generally comprised of 75% particles < 32 mm, with approximately 27% < 4.0 mm. Brook trout production was inversely proportional to substrate permeability in one of two years, suggesting substrate composition was influential in regulating recruitment. In that year, age-0 brook trout abundance was negatively influenced by the amoun… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These velocities are common in the study rivers during the emergence periods of some years (Table 1). In addition, high flow pulses in the study area are typically associated with sediment transport increases followed by further accumulation in the stream bed, which can physically trap alevins, preventing their emergence (Acornley and Sear 1999;Hartman and Hakala 2006). In Hoz Seca, Eresma, and Cega, survival rate was also negatively influenced by the rate of change in discharge (reversals and rise rate) during the emergence period, which can quickly influence habitat availability and suitability for young trout (Olden and Poff 2003;Ayll贸n et al 2009), and therefore limit recruit abundance within the sites.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These velocities are common in the study rivers during the emergence periods of some years (Table 1). In addition, high flow pulses in the study area are typically associated with sediment transport increases followed by further accumulation in the stream bed, which can physically trap alevins, preventing their emergence (Acornley and Sear 1999;Hartman and Hakala 2006). In Hoz Seca, Eresma, and Cega, survival rate was also negatively influenced by the rate of change in discharge (reversals and rise rate) during the emergence period, which can quickly influence habitat availability and suitability for young trout (Olden and Poff 2003;Ayll贸n et al 2009), and therefore limit recruit abundance within the sites.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Brook trout have been shown to suffer from decreased growth as turbidity increases (Sweka & Hartman, 2001b). Additionally, trout reproductive success has been positively correlated with streams with low levels of fine sediments (Petty et al, 2005;Hartman & Hakala, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Brook trout have been shown to suffer from decreased growth as turbidity increases (Sweka and Hartman 2001a). Additionally, trout reproductive success has been positively correlated to streams with low levels of fine sediments (Hartman and Hakala 2006;Petty et al 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%