2018
DOI: 10.22363/2313-1683-2018-15-4-431-445
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relationships of Victimization, Machiavellianism and Conflict Behavior

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
2
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The stated differences are statistically significant with high accuracy: the difference between teachers and students in the degree of exposure is significant with p<0.001, while disposition to manipulation is p<0.001. This confirms the conclusion we arrived at earlier, that manipulators are exposed to manipulation as well [8].…”
Section: Pprs000551 3(1)2019supporting
confidence: 92%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The stated differences are statistically significant with high accuracy: the difference between teachers and students in the degree of exposure is significant with p<0.001, while disposition to manipulation is p<0.001. This confirms the conclusion we arrived at earlier, that manipulators are exposed to manipulation as well [8].…”
Section: Pprs000551 3(1)2019supporting
confidence: 92%
“…The average exposure to manipulation among women (raw score 18,71) is statistically significant with p=0,01 below the corresponding number among men (21,08). The issue of exposure to manipulation among teachers is crucial for the quality of education, because teachers often fall victim to manipulative attacks from dishonest students [8,19]. All the more so, the present research shows that (Figure 1) students are more exposed to manipulation than teachers: Machiavellianism among students (78,65) is higher than that of teachers (70,88).…”
Section: Pprs000551 3(1)2019mentioning
confidence: 57%
See 3 more Smart Citations