2018 IEEE 43rd Conference on Local Computer Networks (LCN) 2018
DOI: 10.1109/lcn.2018.8638073
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Representative Measurement Point Selection to Monitor Software-defined Networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The above two sub‐sections evaluate the advancements of the node selection algorithm and the adaptive timeout mechanism respectively, and in this sub‐section, we present the results of comparing the proposed statistical collection scheme with the existing work in terms of communication overhead, flow completeness, and time consumption. The representative algorithms we choose for comparison include OpenTM, 9 CeMon, 8 FMS, 12 and RMPS 17 . OpenTM and CeMon are emblematic methods of performing per‐flow statistics and per‐switch statistics, respectively, and belong to pull‐based statistics methods.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The above two sub‐sections evaluate the advancements of the node selection algorithm and the adaptive timeout mechanism respectively, and in this sub‐section, we present the results of comparing the proposed statistical collection scheme with the existing work in terms of communication overhead, flow completeness, and time consumption. The representative algorithms we choose for comparison include OpenTM, 9 CeMon, 8 FMS, 12 and RMPS 17 . OpenTM and CeMon are emblematic methods of performing per‐flow statistics and per‐switch statistics, respectively, and belong to pull‐based statistics methods.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Especially for per-flow statistics, query requests with the same number of flows will cause serious communication cost. Note that, compared with the push-based mechanism proposed in FMS 12 and RMPS, 17 our work is also greatly improved, because in the process of statistical collection, we not only avoid the redundancy caused by paying attention to all points in FMS 12 but also significantly reduce the overhead of repeated packet-in messages caused by fixed timeout values in RMPS. 17 We use the percentage of the number of complete flows in the statistical collection results to the total number of flows to express the accuracy of the algorithm.…”
Section: Performance Evaluation Of Overall Schemementioning
confidence: 97%
See 3 more Smart Citations