Reproducibility of heart rate and rating of perceived exertion values obtained from different incremental treadmill tests

Peserico, Cecília Segabinazi; Zagatto, Alessandro Moura; Machado, Fabiana Andrade

doi:10.1016/j.scispo.2014.12.002

Cited by 5 publications

(8 citation statements)

References 31 publications

(61 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The RPE score presented low variability between sessions for ISR with TEM of 0.65 and CV of 9.79%. These results are in line with previous research conducted in laboratory conditions 23 and analysing reproducibility of RPE in three continuous incremental exercises performed on treadmill (TEM between 0.5 and 1.3 and CV between 5.2 to 15.3%). Nevertheless, CV assessed for ISR was lower than that reported in field condition in response to 8min bouts of submaximal intermittent running (10, 11.5 and 13 km.h-1, CV ≈ 31.9%) with team sport athletes 28 .…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 92%

“…Analysing test-retest reliability of mean HR during 4min bouts on treadmill with three submaximal intensities (14, 16 and 18km.h -1 ), Saunders et al 24 reported small TEM (ranged from 2.9 to 3.7bpm) and coefficient of variation (1.7 to 2.4%) with elite male distance runners. Similar results were reported by Peserico et al 23 during submaximal intensity stages in three continuous incremental tests protocols on treadmill for running velocity at 14km.h -1 while TEM reached up 7bpm with lower velocities (8-12km.h -1 ). Furthermore, the present TEM scores for ISR, 3vs3 and 6vs6 are in agreement with previous research reporting values of 2.6 bpm for mean HR during 30min team-sport simulation on a non-motorised treadmill in laboratory 25 .…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 90%

“…TEMs ranged between 2.21 and 2.63 bpm were similar to that reported by previous researches in laboratory conditions 23,24 . Analysing test-retest reliability of mean HR during 4min bouts on treadmill with three submaximal intensities (14, 16 and 18km.h -1 ), Saunders et al 24 reported small TEM (ranged from 2.9 to 3.7bpm) and coefficient of variation (1.7 to 2.4%) with elite male distance runners.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 89%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Reproducibility of heart rate and perceptual demands of game-based training drills in handball players

Ravier

Hassenfratz

Bouzigon

2017

Rev. Bras. Cineantropom. Desempenho Hum.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

-Game-based training are popular in team-sports; however there is a lack of research specific to team handball. The aim of this study was to assess i) the test-retest reliability of heart rate (HR), time spent in HR zone intensities and rating of perceived exertion of a novel small-sided game, ii) and whether it is comparable to that of generic intermittent shuttle running and match play with team handball players. Fourteen elite male handball players completed each exercise comprising two periods of 10min interspersed with 2min recovery in separate occasions and repeated them one week apart. Exercises consisted of intermittent 30s-30s shuttle running (ISR), intermittent 30s-30s small-sided game (with 3-a-side field players, 3vs3) and match play (with 6-a-side field players, 6vs6). Mean HR demonstrated high level of reproducibility for the three drills (r = 0.86-0.89, TEM = 2.21-2.63 bpm, CV = 1.23-1.55%). For time spent in heart rate zones TEMs reached up 1.12, 1.40 and 2.48 min for ISR, 6vs6 and 3vs3, respectively. Specifically for HR zone higher than 90% of HRmax, CVs showed wide extent of scores with 9.73 (ISR), 27.39 (6vs6) and 108.29% (3vs3). Mean HR results suggest that physiological response was consistent between sessions. Because of the poor reproducibility for time spent in the target zone higher than 90% of HRmax, the efficiency of both 3vs3 and 6vs6 in improving aerobic power should be analysed with caution. The present results suggest that reproducibility of physiological demand of ball-drills should be considered before prescribing them as conditioning training.Key words: Heart rate; Intensity; Perception; Reliability. (r = 0,89; TEM = 2,63 bpm; CV = 1,55% Resumo -O treino através do jogo é popular quando se trata de esportes coletivos. Contudo, constata-se uma falta de estudos específicos sobre a prática do handball. Objetivou-se testar a reprodutibilidade de um jogo com equipe reduzida através da análise da frequência cardíaca (HR), do tempo decorrido nas diversas faixas de intensidade de HR e da percepção do esforço. A reprodutibilidade do jogo com equipe reduzida foi comparada àquelas de um exercício padrão de corrida e de um jogo de handball. Quatorze jogadores de handball masculino nível elite realizaram um mesmo exercício em duas ocasiões com uma semana de intervalo entre elas. Cada exercício foi realizado em dois períodos de 10 minutos com dois minutos de intervalo entre cada um. Os diferentes exercícios consistiram numa corrida intermitente de 30s-30s, realizadas em ida e volta (ISR); um jogo com equipe reduzida intermitente de 30s-30s (com três jogadores em cada equipe, 3vs3); e um jogo de handball (com 6 jogadores em cada equipe, 6vs6). A HR média demonstrou um nível avançado de reprodutibilidade dos três exercícios

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 92%

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 90%

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 89%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Reproducibility of heart rate and perceptual demands of game-based training drills in handball players

Ravier

Hassenfratz

Bouzigon

2017

Rev. Bras. Cineantropom. Desempenho Hum.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…min -1 can be attributed to normal variability (Achten and Jeukendrup, 2003). The reproducibility of HR at FBLC (ICC: 0.86-0.92, TE: 0.96-1.55%) was higher than values found in other studies using recreational runners (ICC: 0.47-0.79, TE: 1.6-4.3%), which have used HR at intensities corresponding to fixed physiological thresholds (Lourenco et al, 2011;Peserico et al, 2015). Despite the age of the participants used in our study, this discrepancy is likely due to the training status of the athletes, as similar dietary and lifestyle constraints were applied, and previous work has shown lesser-trained runners show larger daily variability in HR scores (Heitkamp et al, 1991) compared to well-trained runners (Brisswalter and Legros, 1994).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 66%

Test–retest reliability of physiological parameters in elite junior distance runners following allometric scaling

Blagrove

Howatson

Hayes

2017

European Journal of Sport Science

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study aimed to quantify the intra-individual reliability of a number of physiological variables in a group of national and international young distance runners. Sixteen (8 male, 8 female) participants (16.7 ± 1.4 years) performed a submaximal incremental running assessment followed by a maximal running test, on two occasions separated by no more than seven days. Maximal oxygen uptake (V̇O), speed at V̇O (km h), running economy and speed and heart rate (HR) at fixed blood lactate concentrations were determined. V̇O and running economy were scaled for differences in body mass using a power exponent derived from a larger cohort of young runners (n = 42). Running economy was expressed as oxygen cost and energy cost at the speed associated with lactate turnpoint (LTP) and the two speeds prior to LTP. Results of analysis of variance revealed an absence of systematic bias between trials. Reliability indices showed a high level of reproducibility across all parameters (typical error [TE] ≤2%; intra-class correlation coefficient >0.8; effect size <0.6). Expressing running economy as energy cost appears to provide superior reliability than using oxygen cost (TE ∼1.5% vs. ∼2%). Blood lactate and HR were liable to daily fluctuations of 0.14-0.22 mmol L and 4-5 beats min respectively. The minimum detectable change values (95% confidence) for each parameter are also reported. Exercise physiologists can be confident that measurement of important physiological determinants of distance running performance are highly reproducible in elite junior runners.

show abstract

“…The non-difference observed in HR ma x in both tests is similar to findings of other studies. Peserico et al 27 did not observe significant difference when different increment rates per stage were adopted. Vucetic et al 28 compared two T RAMP with lower and higher increment rate (1 km•h -1 every 30 s vs. 1 min) and also found no significant difference.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 89%

Graded and ramp protocols present similar results in apparently healthy subjects

Lima

Santos

Damasceno

et al. 2020

Rev. bras. cineantropom. desempenho hum.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The aim of the study was to compare maximum oxygen uptake, maximum heart rate, speed corresponding to VO2max, time to exhaustion, and ventilatory thresholds between two maximal test protocols (scaled vs ramp) with equalized metabolic demand in apparently healthy young adults. Twenty-seven subjects of both sexes were analyzed and submitted to two maximum tests: 1) scaled test with 1.2 km∙h-1 every 2 min; 2) ramp test with 0.1 km∙h-1 every 0.18 min; both with 1% slope and maximum total duration of twenty minutes. Respiratory gas exchanges were directly analyzed, and ventilatory thresholds determined through visual inspection. Central tendency and dispersion measures were adopted, as well as paired t-test and effect size. Bland-Altman analysis verified the agreement among variables. Maximum speed showed significance difference (p < 0.01) for the scaled test (14.0 ± 1.9 km∙h-1) and ramp test (14.6 ± 2.3 km∙h-1). Even with small BIAS values, negative trend and high limits of agreement could be observed. Despite the non-difference presented for variables, except for maximum speed, it could be concluded that the scaled test is able to determine the analyzed variables similar to the ramp test, considering the same conditions of the present study.

show abstract

Reproducibility of heart rate and rating of perceived exertion values obtained from different incremental treadmill tests

Cited by 5 publications

References 31 publications

Reproducibility of heart rate and perceptual demands of game-based training drills in handball players

Reproducibility of heart rate and perceptual demands of game-based training drills in handball players

Test–retest reliability of physiological parameters in elite junior distance runners following allometric scaling

Graded and ramp protocols present similar results in apparently healthy subjects

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About