Resilience, Adaptability, and Transformability in the Goulburn-Broken Catchment, Australia

Abstract

We present a resilience-based approach for assessing sustainability in a sub-catchment of the Murray-Darling Basin in southeast Australia. We define the regional system and identify the main issues, drivers, and potential shocks, then assess both specified and general resilience. The current state of the system is a consequence of changes in resource use. We identify ten known or possible biophysical, economic, and social thresholds operating at different scales, with possible knock-on effects between them. Crossing those thresholds may result in irreversible changes in goods and services generated by the region. Changes in resilience, in general, reflect a pattern of past losses with some signs of recent improvements. Interventions in the system for managing resilience are constrained by current governance, and attention needs to be paid to the roles and capacities of the various institutions. An overview of the current state of the system and likely future trends suggests that transformational change in the region be seriously considered.

Tipping Toward Sustainability: Emerging Pathways of Transformation

“…Hence, when radical new social or ecological problems arise, whether in the form of pandemics or of climate change, our capacity to innovate in response is hampered by a history of technological path dependency and a culture of supply driven innovation. This comes close to technological lock-in, reinforced through several forms of positive feedback (Kaiser 2003;Walker et al 2009), including social, legal, and economic variables.…”

Reconnecting to the Biosphere

“…Crossing such thresholds may result in irreversible changes in the region. Transforming away from the current situation requires people to change deep values and identity (Walker et al 2009a).…”

A Framework for Resilience-based Governance of Social-Ecological Systems

“…Although this aspect of reflexive environmental law is appealing for scale-dependent management, for it to be legally sound, there would need to be a modification because the "slow variables", and therefore the threshold for a particular environmental issue would need to be established (see Walker et al 2009). Thus, the process has freedom for innovation, so long as there are trigger points for management actions, i.e., thresholds.…”