2017
DOI: 10.1161/circinterventions.117.005766
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Response by Desai et al to Letter Regarding Article, “Defining Prolonged Dwell Time: When Are Advanced Inferior Vena Cava Filter Retrieval Techniques Necessary? An Analysis in 762 Procedures”

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Long-dwelling IVC filters are associated with higher complication rates. 2 Long dwell times (>6 months) are a risk factor for failure of standard retrieval techniques 3,4 and are associated with high rates of the need to use adjunctive techniques for retrieval 3 which is likely secondary to incorporation of device in the caval wall, IVC thrombosis and penetration of the caval wall. 5 Furthermore, long-dwell IVC filters have a higher rate of retrieval complications.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Long-dwelling IVC filters are associated with higher complication rates. 2 Long dwell times (>6 months) are a risk factor for failure of standard retrieval techniques 3,4 and are associated with high rates of the need to use adjunctive techniques for retrieval 3 which is likely secondary to incorporation of device in the caval wall, IVC thrombosis and penetration of the caval wall. 5 Furthermore, long-dwell IVC filters have a higher rate of retrieval complications.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is postulated that long-dwell filters may have a slightly increased risk of complications based on published studies that suggest retrievability becomes more difficult with dwell time longer than 6 months. 3,4 Leaving the filter in situ permanently was a consideration for this patient however given their young age, lack of long-term data for in situ retrievable IVC filters and high retrievability rates for long-dwell filters, a decision was made for an attempt at retrieval. The potential risks of non-retrieval versus retrieval were discussed in the informed consent process, the risks are summarised in Table 1.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Filters with an embedded hook or that tilted >15° have been associated with 129 and up to 33 times higher risk of difficult retrieval, respectively ( 41 , 56 ). In a study by Desai et al ( 57 ), when filters were carried for more than 210 days, advanced retrieval techniques were needed in over 40% of the cases.…”
Section: Current Limitations Of Filter Retrievalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It soon became apparent that rIVCFs also were not without risk, especially those with long dwell times. 13 New filter designs now allow for conversion to IVC stents. These designs include the VenaTech Convertible (B. Braun Medical, Germany) and Sentry filters (Boston Scientific).…”
Section: Historymentioning
confidence: 99%