1969
DOI: 10.1038/2221047a0
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Response of Aequorin Bioluminescence to Rapid Changes in Calcium Concentration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

10
74
2
1

Year Published

1975
1975
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 140 publications
(87 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
10
74
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In WT, F was 615 Ϯ 21 ms at 1.24 mM Ca 2ϩ , close to the 833 ms reported assuming monoexponential decay (15). In contrast, other kinetic parameters appeared to depend on EF-hand domains.…”
Section: Bright and Slodk Mutationssupporting
confidence: 76%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In WT, F was 615 Ϯ 21 ms at 1.24 mM Ca 2ϩ , close to the 833 ms reported assuming monoexponential decay (15). In contrast, other kinetic parameters appeared to depend on EF-hand domains.…”
Section: Bright and Slodk Mutationssupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Our data show that in WT aequorin, both the light intensity and the decay rate are greater at higher [Ca 2ϩ ], such that the total light (integral, ⌺ T ) is the same at different Ca 2ϩ concentrations. Although the [Ca 2ϩ ] dependence of the decay rate has been reported early (15), the present study reveals that it results from variations of a fast and a slow component. The fast and slow components coexisted across mutants and Ca 2ϩ concentrations and were even observed in double EF-hand mutants where only one EF hand is left unaffected.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 58%
See 3 more Smart Citations