2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2019.05.040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reusing exterior wall framing systems: A cradle-to-cradle comparative life cycle assessment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
21
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Many authors favor the revised utilization of local resources in building projects, allowing the shortening of supply chains [31] and the possibility for closed loop (circular) supply relationships where materials are reused and remanufactured into new building components [32]. The term "cradle to cradle" has been used to describe the potential to reuse materials (extending their lifespan), and this concept has been explored by works such as that in [33], whose authors examine the recycling of steel wall framing components through disassembly. These authors, while acknowledging the potential of reuse, note that there is reluctance in the construction industry at large to adopt this philosophy [33].…”
Section: Relevant Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Many authors favor the revised utilization of local resources in building projects, allowing the shortening of supply chains [31] and the possibility for closed loop (circular) supply relationships where materials are reused and remanufactured into new building components [32]. The term "cradle to cradle" has been used to describe the potential to reuse materials (extending their lifespan), and this concept has been explored by works such as that in [33], whose authors examine the recycling of steel wall framing components through disassembly. These authors, while acknowledging the potential of reuse, note that there is reluctance in the construction industry at large to adopt this philosophy [33].…”
Section: Relevant Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The term "cradle to cradle" has been used to describe the potential to reuse materials (extending their lifespan), and this concept has been explored by works such as that in [33], whose authors examine the recycling of steel wall framing components through disassembly. These authors, while acknowledging the potential of reuse, note that there is reluctance in the construction industry at large to adopt this philosophy [33]. To this end, Tingley et al [34] advise that the creation of a database of suppliers and reused sections would be beneficial along with supporting technical guidance as to the correct reuse process for building materials.…”
Section: Relevant Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The production, construction, use, and demolition of building materials significantly contributes to the worldwide usage of resources and waste [5][6][7][8]. Around 40% of all raw resources are used in construction and demolition worldwide [9][10][11]. Furthermore, construction operations require 32% of global energy use, and are responsible for one third of greenhouse gas emissions globally [5,10,[12][13][14][15][16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the same time, regional characteristics should be considered in the selection of building materials to avoid transferring the environmental impact of the construction phase to the construction operation phase. Some scholars have compared building materials [26,[57][58][59][60][61][62][63][64][65], and some scholars have considered the influence of the external environment when evaluating building materials [13,20,21,66] These studies can provide a reference for building designers to choose building materials.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%