2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2018.09.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reverse logistics network design under extended producer responsibility: The case of out-of-use tires in the Gran Santiago city of Chile

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0
9

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
16
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…If this is not possible, waste should be reused, recycled, and then recovered for energy, while landfilling should be avoided. Accordingly, the tire EPR system should reduce the generation of tire waste, facilitate its reuse, promote recycling and other forms of material recovery and, finally, incentive the energy recovery, although LCA studies confirmed that the material recycling of tire waste provides greater environmental benefits than energy recovery [118,119,120].…”
Section: Environmental and Social Issues Due To Sw Mismanagementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If this is not possible, waste should be reused, recycled, and then recovered for energy, while landfilling should be avoided. Accordingly, the tire EPR system should reduce the generation of tire waste, facilitate its reuse, promote recycling and other forms of material recovery and, finally, incentive the energy recovery, although LCA studies confirmed that the material recycling of tire waste provides greater environmental benefits than energy recovery [118,119,120].…”
Section: Environmental and Social Issues Due To Sw Mismanagementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Corporate social responsibility (CSR) issues have long been recognized in the supply chain and operations management (SCOM) literature (Babich and Tang, 2012;Chen and Lee, 2016;Dhanorkar et al, 2018;Lampikoski et al, 2014;Porteous et al, 2015;Wilhelm et al, 2016) whereas one stream of research focused on whether and how CSR practice implementation could lead to superior corporate operational performances (Chen et al, 2015;Flammer, 2015;McWilliams and Siegel, 2000;Tang et al, 2012) and identifying critical contingency factors (e.g., corporate characteristics and external pressures) that may influence such linkage (Arora and Dharwadkar, 2011;Saeidi et al, 2015;Torugsa, O'Donohue and Hecker, 2012). Despite the disagreement on the effectiveness of CSR practice implementation on corporate operating performance, in the modern business world, no corporate needs to be convinced that maintaining CSR at an acceptable level is deemed legitimate for trading in domestic and international markets (Banguera et al, 2018;Tseng et al, 2018;Matten and Moon, 2008). This is because stakeholders such as regulators and customers increasingly require firms to maintain a certain level of CSR within their operations and across their extended supply chains.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At present, the use of this specific tool in the EU area refers to a variety of contexts and covers several products such as end‐of‐life vehicles, batteries, packaging, oils, graphic paper, and waste electrical and electronic equipment (European Commission, ). In relation to this, various works in the specific literature have deepened the understanding of how the EPR mechanism helps the management of specific types of wastes such as those related to end‐of‐life vehicles (Gerrard & Kandlikar, ; Santini et al, ; Xiang & Ming, ), waste electrical and electronic equipment (Bahers & Kim, ; Wang et al, ), packaging (Pires, Martinho, Ribeiro, Mota, & Teixeira, ; Rubio, Rodrigues Pereira Ramos, Rodrigues Leitao, & Barbosa‐Povoa, ), and tyres (Banguera, Sepulveda, Ternero, Vargas, & Vásquez, ; Milanez & Bührs, ). As for the agricultural sector, only eight countries in Europe have implemented national regulations on EPR schemes, particularly for plastic waste management, to meet the EU circular economy requirements (APE Europe, n.d., www.plastiques-agricoles.com).…”
Section: Agricultural Plastics: Pros Cons and Economic Tools For Thmentioning
confidence: 99%