2020
DOI: 10.1007/s12020-020-02194-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risk stratification for lateral involvement in papillary thyroid carcinoma patients with central lymph node metastasis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

4
34
3
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
4
34
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Besides, ETE was also an independent predictor for ipsi-LLNM, which was consistent with previous studies (32)(33)(34)(35)(36)(37). We considered that the more aggressive the tumor, the greater the probability of LNM.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Besides, ETE was also an independent predictor for ipsi-LLNM, which was consistent with previous studies (32)(33)(34)(35)(36)(37). We considered that the more aggressive the tumor, the greater the probability of LNM.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…We therefore further evaluated the predictive factors for the lateral multiple-metastasis in N1b PTMC. Other studies (4,14,28) have reported that CPLN was a predictor of lateral LNM in PTC patients. Xiao et al (29) conducted ipsilateral LND for PTC patients and demonstrated that CPLN ≥ 2 was a reliable indicator of lateral LNM.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…The risk factors for the lateral LNM in PTMC patients have been investigated (12)(13)(14)(15). To the best of our knowledge, though, lateral multiple-level metastasis in N1b PTMC patients has never been previously reported.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…LLNM has been included as a risk factor for structural recurrence in ATA (12)and has even been shown to influence outcome in some reports (23). As an essential risk factor for LLNM, the number of CCLMs is increasingly being included in risk stratification, with typical cutoff values of 2-3 and 5 (18,24,25). We identified number of CLNMs as an independent risk factor for LLNM when patients were stratified into 0, 1-2, and ≥3 CLNM groups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%