2021
DOI: 10.3389/fnbot.2021.700823
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Robust Torque Predictions From Electromyography Across Multiple Levels of Active Exoskeleton Assistance Despite Non-linear Reorganization of Locomotor Output

Abstract: Robotic exoskeletons can assist humans with walking by providing supplemental torque in proportion to the user's joint torque. Electromyographic (EMG) control algorithms can estimate a user's joint torque directly using real-time EMG recordings from the muscles that generate the torque. However, EMG signals change as a result of supplemental torque from an exoskeleton, resulting in unreliable estimates of the user's joint torque during active exoskeleton assistance. Here, we present an EMG control framework fo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, only 12 repetitions of each movement were used for training in the intra-session case, while other studies using CNN for torque prediction reported using 16 or more repetitions for training. For instance, George et al [5] reported that at least 20 gait cycles were needed for the CNN prediction (intra-session) of hip sagittal plane joint torque to start improving, and the results only became reliable at around 35 gait cycles. Schulte et al [11] achieved good CNN prediction of the knee non-weight bearing torque over several days using the trial of 20 repetitions with a 80% training and 20% validation split.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this study, only 12 repetitions of each movement were used for training in the intra-session case, while other studies using CNN for torque prediction reported using 16 or more repetitions for training. For instance, George et al [5] reported that at least 20 gait cycles were needed for the CNN prediction (intra-session) of hip sagittal plane joint torque to start improving, and the results only became reliable at around 35 gait cycles. Schulte et al [11] achieved good CNN prediction of the knee non-weight bearing torque over several days using the trial of 20 repetitions with a 80% training and 20% validation split.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It allows detecting the movement before the onset [1] thus improving the device acceptance by the users [2], [3]. Moreover, this approach allows incorporating the active effort of the user [4], [5] even in cases when the movement is altered due to musculoskeletal impairment [6]. Accurately mapping the EMG signals of the muscles surrounding the joint to the joint torque is not trivial due to the non-linear relationship between these variables.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These metrics would unify the validation process of robotic exoskeletons and would justify the scientific evidence and clinical relevance of their role in gait assistance or rehabilitation. In this regard, understanding and estimating the torque and force transmission from the robotic device to the user and the biomechanical effects of this interaction is crucial, as it could boost the therapeutic outcomes involving exoskeletons in rehabilitation therapies ( Lerner et al, 2017a ; George et al, 2021 ). These methods would enable the comparison between systems as they directly quantify the exoskeleton performance and establish a common paradigm that can be used independently of the evaluated device.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, we observed a reduction in residual limb extension torque, which could indicate reduced effort in the extensor muscles in the residual limb. Future work should explore the changes in lower-limb muscular effort while wearing the hip exoskeleton, similar to what was recently done in nonamputee individuals [50].…”
Section: A Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 93%