2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.comnet.2020.107686
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scheduling coflows of multi-stage jobs under network resource constraints

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Few works have also considered scheduling coflows in general network topologies with bandwidth constraints [32] [11] [33]. The work in [32] proposed an efficient online solution for the multiple online coflow routing and scheduling problem.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Few works have also considered scheduling coflows in general network topologies with bandwidth constraints [32] [11] [33]. The work in [32] proposed an efficient online solution for the multiple online coflow routing and scheduling problem.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a multi-stage job scenario, due to the dependency between coflows, minimizing CCT may not minimize JCT. To the best of our knowledge, only a few works [12], [13], [1], [25] considered the coflow scheduling problem in the case of multi-stage jobs. Aalo [12] is the first effective heuristic algorithm with the objective of minimizing JCT, which discusses coflow scheduling in multi-stage jobs, and proposes to prioritize coflows according to dependency orders to schedule coflow.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this approach cannot scale to job DAGs of arbitrary sizes and shapes, and ignores the online situation where multiple multi-stage jobs coexist in the network. Similarly, [25] is the first to study how to schedule multi-stage jobs under taking network resource constraints into account so as to minimize the total weighted JCT.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Y. Chen et al proposed the multi-hop coflow routing and scheduling (MCRS) strategy in the popular Spine-Leaf topology and allocated longer detour paths to coflows to alleviate link congestion [ 36 , 37 ], which is applicable to over-subscribed Spine-Leaf networks. The authors of [ 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 ] only focused on joint flow scheduling and routing cases at the coflow level, whereas Y. Zeng et al were the first to study the job-level case [ 38 ]. They formulated the multi-stage job joint scheduling and routing problem as a non-linear weighted JCT minimization problem and designed a polynomial-time Multi-stage Job Scheduling (MJS) algorithm.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%