“…The use of buffers was criticized because it is based on unrealistic straight-line distances which do not account for topography, transport modes, seasonality, mobility of people, the attractiveness of facilities, the inability of sick people to walk, and documented healthcare-seeking behaviour (such as bypassing the nearest facility). Straight-line distances are unrealistic, do not account for topography, transport modes, the likelihood of living beyond the threshold, lack of updated spatial and healthcareseeking behaviour data, the inability of sick people to walk, facilities are not uniformly attractive, seasonal mobility of people, bypassing of the nearest facility, the catchment is not a function of distance only Radial buffers accounting for geographical barriers [55], enumeration [56,57] or parish boundaries and road networks [34,58] Thiessen polygon, a region incorporating all points that are closer to a given facility than any other [6,[59][60][61] All points that are closer to a given facility than any other Health facility, coarse residential location Straight-line distances are unrealistic, bypassing the nearest facility, does not account for transport modes, healthcare-seeking behaviour and other factors beyond distance, percapita utilization rate is constant within the HFCA Thiessen polygon with boundaries, travel factors, buffers, and population [62] Modelled travel time or distance based on a leastcost path model [5,13,38,[63][64][65][66][67][68][69][70][71][72] or on network analysis [73] often adjusted for facility capacity [74], population [75], Thiessen polygon [76], boundary [77,78] [71] combined with patient address [88] and gravity models [89] considers interaction between supply and demand Facility, urban residence, travel factors, population, capa...…”