2000
DOI: 10.1016/s1388-2457(99)00313-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Schizophrenia-like deficits in auditory P1 and N1 refractoriness induced by the psychomimetic agent phencyclidine (PCP)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

6
59
1
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
6
59
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Several lines of evidence indicate reduced NMDA receptor (NMDAR) signalling in schizophrenia (Moghaddam, 2003;Javitt and Zukin, 1991) and in particular in the pathophysiology of the observed startle habituation, gating, and AEP generation alterations in schizophrenia (Javitt et al, 2000a;Klamer et al, 2004;Geyer et al, 2001). To provide supporting evidence for this hypothesis we tested a mouse mutant with 90% reduced expression of the NR1 subunit of the NMDA receptor (subsequently named NR1 mutants in this paper) in these paradigms (Mohn et al, 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Several lines of evidence indicate reduced NMDA receptor (NMDAR) signalling in schizophrenia (Moghaddam, 2003;Javitt and Zukin, 1991) and in particular in the pathophysiology of the observed startle habituation, gating, and AEP generation alterations in schizophrenia (Javitt et al, 2000a;Klamer et al, 2004;Geyer et al, 2001). To provide supporting evidence for this hypothesis we tested a mouse mutant with 90% reduced expression of the NR1 subunit of the NMDA receptor (subsequently named NR1 mutants in this paper) in these paradigms (Mohn et al, 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Thus our findings differ from the peak recovery profile observed in patients with schizophrenia who show a deficit in generation of the maximum P1 and N1 at long ISIs, but no difference in the slope of the peak recovery function (Roth et al, 1980;Shelley et al, 1999). Our initial hypothesis to find a similar profile in the NR1 mutant mice was based on studies in rats, non-human primates and healthy volunteers, in which such a profile was reproduced by acute application of NMDAR antagonists, pointing to a possible involvement of the NMDAR in this deficit (Javitt et al, 2000a;Ehlers et al, 1992;Umbricht et al, 2004a). Furthermore, previous studies have shown that the mouse AEP peaks P1, N1, and P2 display refractory curves comparable to their putative human correlates (P1, N1, P2) (Umbricht et al, 2004b;Maxwell et al, 2004).…”
Section: Aep Peak Refractorinessmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Two tasks that measure the sensory gating of event-related potentials (ERPs) are the paired click paradigm, as a transient gating measure, and the interstimulus interval paradigm (ISI), as a steady-state gating measure (Erwin et al, 1994). The paired click paradigm contains two tones presented 500 ms apart with a 9-s interval between pairs, while the ISI task typically utilizes trains of stimuli at short intervals ranging from 0.25 to 1 s and longer intervals ranging from 2 to 10 s. During the ISI task in human studies, the amplitude of the N100 decreases with decreasing interstimulus intervals in healthy individuals (Boutros et al, 1999;Javitt et al, 2000). In contrast to the N100, the amplitude of the human P50 does not increase with increasing interstimulus intervals ranging from 1 to 16 s (Javitt et al, 2000;McFarland et al, 1975;Onitsuka et al, 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The paired click paradigm contains two tones presented 500 ms apart with a 9-s interval between pairs, while the ISI task typically utilizes trains of stimuli at short intervals ranging from 0.25 to 1 s and longer intervals ranging from 2 to 10 s. During the ISI task in human studies, the amplitude of the N100 decreases with decreasing interstimulus intervals in healthy individuals (Boutros et al, 1999;Javitt et al, 2000). In contrast to the N100, the amplitude of the human P50 does not increase with increasing interstimulus intervals ranging from 1 to 16 s (Javitt et al, 2000;McFarland et al, 1975;Onitsuka et al, 2000). While some reports suggest that the human P200 displays an increase in amplitude with increasing ISI, to our knowledge, the human P200 has not been thoroughly investigated using this paradigm (Budd et al, 1998;Shelley et al, 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation