Migratory connectivity describes to which degree different breeding populations have distinct (nonâoverlapping) nonâbreeding sites. Uncovering the level of migratory connectivity is crucial for effective conservation actions and for understanding of the evolution of local adaptations and migratory routes. Here we investigate migration patterns in a passerine bird, the great reed warbler Acrocephalus arundinaceus, over its wide Western Palearctic breeding range using geolocators from Spain, Sweden, Czech Republic, Bulgaria and Turkey. We found moderate migratory connectivity: a highly significant spatial structure in the connections between breeding and subâSaharan nonâbreeding grounds, but at the same time a partial overlap between individual populations, particularly along the Gulf of Guinea where the majority of birds from the Spanish, Swedish and Czech populations spent their nonâbreeding period. The postâbreeding migration routes were similar in direction and rather parallel for the five populations. Birds from Turkey showed the most distinctive migratory routes and subâSaharan nonâbreeding range, with a postâbreeding migration to east Africa and, together with birds from Bulgaria, a previously unknown preâbreeding migration over the Arabian Peninsula indicating counterâclockwise loop migration. The distances between breeding and subâSaharan nonâbreeding sites, as well as between first and final subâSaharan nonâbreeding sites, differed among populations. However, the total speed of migration did not differ significantly between populations; neither during postâbreeding migration in autumn, nor preâbreeding migration in spring. There was also no significant relationship between the total speed of migration and distance between breeding and nonâbreeding sites (neither postâ nor preâbreeding) and, surprisingly, the total speed of migration generally did not differ significantly between postâbreeding and preâbreeding migration. Future challenges include understanding whether nonâbreeding environmental conditions may have influenced the differences in migratory patterns that we observed between populations, and to which extent nonâbreeding habitat fluctuations and loss may affect population sizes of migrants.