2016
DOI: 10.29333/iejme/334
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Selection of Appropriate Statistical Methods for Research Results Processing

Abstract: The purpose of the article is to provide an algorithm that allows choosing a valid method of statistical data processing and development of a model for acquiring knowledge about statistical methods and mastering skills of competent knowledge application in various research activities. Modelling method is a leading approach to the study of this problem. It allows us to consider this issue as a targeted and organized process of application of the author's methodology for the selection of appropriate statistical … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Univariate frequency tables of tests E0 and FA were prepared as well as tables with the summary of the main statistical values for the continuous variables (E1, E2, E3 and E4). As a first step, normality of the data was assessed in the continuous variables (E1-E4) using the Shapiro-Wilk test, and following Khusainova et al (2016). Only variable E2 did not deviate significantly from the normal distribution (W = 0.982, p = 0.077), and there were no significant differences between the variances of the two groups (A and B) in the Levene test (F(1) = 1.186, p = 0.278).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Univariate frequency tables of tests E0 and FA were prepared as well as tables with the summary of the main statistical values for the continuous variables (E1, E2, E3 and E4). As a first step, normality of the data was assessed in the continuous variables (E1-E4) using the Shapiro-Wilk test, and following Khusainova et al (2016). Only variable E2 did not deviate significantly from the normal distribution (W = 0.982, p = 0.077), and there were no significant differences between the variances of the two groups (A and B) in the Levene test (F(1) = 1.186, p = 0.278).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second perspective to be considered is the statistical significance of the factors subject to monitoring [32,33].…”
Section: Step 2: Statistical Significancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The medians of individual ratios of funding sources vary. The statistical significance of such differences was reviewed using the Kruskal-Wallis test [32,33].…”
Section: Statistical Verification Of Financial Riskmentioning
confidence: 99%