2021
DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2021.779231
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Selective Cross-Subject Transfer Learning Based on Riemannian Tangent Space for Motor Imagery Brain-Computer Interface

Abstract: A motor imagery (MI) brain-computer interface (BCI) plays an important role in the neurological rehabilitation training for stroke patients. Electroencephalogram (EEG)-based MI BCI has high temporal resolution, which is convenient for real-time BCI control. Therefore, we focus on EEG-based MI BCI in this paper. The identification of MI EEG signals is always quite challenging. Due to high inter-session/subject variability, each subject should spend long and tedious calibration time in collecting amounts of labe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Jeng et al [18] introduced a low-dimensional representation-based TL framework for MI decoding based on tensor decomposition. Xu et al [15] proposed an instance-based selective TL approach for MI in the Riemannian tangent space, which utilizes labeled samples from the source and target subjects. • Deep TL: It has also been well studied in MI and aBCI.…”
Section: Transfer Learning For MI and Abcimentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Jeng et al [18] introduced a low-dimensional representation-based TL framework for MI decoding based on tensor decomposition. Xu et al [15] proposed an instance-based selective TL approach for MI in the Riemannian tangent space, which utilizes labeled samples from the source and target subjects. • Deep TL: It has also been well studied in MI and aBCI.…”
Section: Transfer Learning For MI and Abcimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Transfer learning (TL) [11] is a promising approach to alleviate this problem. Various TL approaches have been proposed for BCI in the last decade, e.g., adaptive CSP [12], data alignment [13], [14], instance-based TL [15], [16], feature-based TL [17], [18], and deep TL [19]. For aBCIs, existing TL approaches mainly include feature-based TL [20] and adversarial-based deep TL [21], [22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the regularization parameters, which were used to evaluate the differences between the labelled source and target domains, were often manually set or were obtained by means of cross-validation. Recently, since affine transformation can make the covariance matrices of EEG data from different domains close, RA-based supervised transfer learning algorithms have received widespread attention in different EEG-based BCIs [40][41][42][43]. Zanini first performed RA for each domain using the Riemannian mean of its resting trials as the reference matrix and then concatenated all aligned matrices from the labelled domains to train a minimum distance to mean (MDM) classifier based on Riemannian Gaussian distributions [44].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nowadays, a robotic arm can be controlled via measuring and recording electroencephalogram (EEG) signals, which is progressively used in BCI applications of non-invasive modalities for its practicality and security (Gao et al, 2003 ; Kumar and Reddy, 2020 ). Several commonly used EEG paradigms include steady-state visual evoked potential (SSVEP), P300 (Farwell et al, 2014 ; Yin et al, 2016 ), and motor imagery (MI) (Song and Kim, 2019 ; Xu et al, 2021 ). Compared to the EEG paradigms of P300 and MI, the SSVEP-based BCI system is preferable in robotic arms control owing to the little training and relatively high recognition accuracy (Ge et al, 2019 ; Chen et al, 2020 ; Zhang et al, 2020 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%