2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0082-0784(00)80272-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Self-ignition and transition to flame-holding in a rectangular scramjet combustor with a backward step

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…12 shows the hydrogen mass fractions around the backward-facing step and the cavity. This means that the fast chemical reaction is allowed in the recirculation zone behind the step (Takahashi et al 2000) and in the cavity (Gruber et al 2001). Because the cavity is located downstream of the fuel injection, the penetration depth of the hydrogen in case 2 is smaller than that in case 1.…”
Section: Cavity Flowmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…12 shows the hydrogen mass fractions around the backward-facing step and the cavity. This means that the fast chemical reaction is allowed in the recirculation zone behind the step (Takahashi et al 2000) and in the cavity (Gruber et al 2001). Because the cavity is located downstream of the fuel injection, the penetration depth of the hydrogen in case 2 is smaller than that in case 1.…”
Section: Cavity Flowmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, this has become one of the most important issues to be dealt with for future hypersonic airbreathing propulsive systems. Recently, the backward-facing step (Halupovich et al 1999;Mitani and Kouchi 2005;Takahashi et al 2000) and the cavity flameholder Hanson 1998, 2001;Gu et al 2009) are widely used to solve this problem in the scramjet combustor to generate the recirculation zones with low flow velocity which can prolong the residence time of the flow formed in the core region, upstream of the fuel injector, and in the cavity. However, the flameholding mechanisms of these two different geometric models are still not clear enough to design a scramjet engine with the highest possible combustion efficiency, the advantages and differences between their flameholding mechanisms have rarely been compared and discussed in the open literature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, with the development of scramjet engine, backward-facing step as the flame holder has drawn more attention in combustor design due to its simple geometry. The backward-facing step can generate recirculation zones with low flow velocity and prolong the residence time of the flow formed in the step corner as discussed by Halupovich et al [8], Takahashi et al [9], and Mitani and Kouchi [10]. Recently, Huang et al [11] have investigated the flameholding mechanism in the combustor.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To solve this problem, some fuel injection techniques have been proposed. The strut [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14], the cavity [15][16][17][18], the cantilevered ramp [4], the backward facing step [19][20][21] and the combination [22][23][24][25], whose principle is to generate vorticity in the vicinity of the walls of the combustor. The region forming the vorticity, namely the recirculation zone, has low flow velocity.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%