Semiotic Interpretation of Lotka–Volterra Model and its Usage in Knowledge Management

Evdokimov, K. E.; Kuznetsov, Valery G.; Melik-Gaykazyan, Irina V.; Melik-Gaykazyan, Maria V.

doi:10.1051/shsconf/20162801033

Cited by 7 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 11 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…It is the consequence of shortage of bioethical measurement applied to whole the educational process. At the same time research of innovations and knowledge management following all the stages of creation and implementation of convergent technologies, demonstrate the presence of "semiotic attractors" (roles of which are played by bioethical models (Evdokimov et al, 2016a(Evdokimov et al, , 2016bMelik-Gaykazyan et al, 2016) in self-organization of educational systems. Content of these attractors confirms the strength of bioethics' symbolism that is generated by reality of convergent technologies and reveals the perspectives of neuropedagogy in management of knowledge.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Neuropedagogy And Bioethics' Symbolism: Place In Knowledge Management

Первушина¹

2018

The European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Sciences

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The convergence of information, biomedical and cognitive technologies results in growing popularity of neuro-sciences. Neuro-sciences related to humanitarian research (including educational) emerge. The goal of the research described in the work is to define a measure of conceptual novelty in combining neuro-science and pedagogics. To reach the goal stated, the author solved the following tasks: searching for criterion dividing the initiative of naming from the initiative of neuro-science's research; setting the stand from which researching programs of neuro-science were developed; uncovering ethical aspects of neuro-science from a bioethical point of view; defining the relevant position for discovering neuropedagogy' perspectives in knowledge management. As a criterion of neuroscience, the one suggested by A.Y. Alekseev was selected: a science may be reasonably called "neuro" if its methods are mostly connectionist. This criterion emphasizes two moments: specification of neuroscience methods and the interdisciplinary nature of this new branch of science. Neuropedagogy must take into consideration the specifics of neuroethics', neuroesthetics' and neurophilosophy's epistemology. Along with this, "neuro" prefix supposes examined impacts aimed at the brain and corporeality. In its turn, this causes the necessity to take into account the bioethical problematics while implementing such impacts. Popularity of neuro-science in humanitarian research is a symbolic reaction to convergent technologies. This is implemented in bioethics' symbolism within the modern culture and related to knowledge management.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Neuropedagogy And Bioethics' Symbolism: Place In Knowledge Management

Первушина¹

2018

The European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Sciences

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The modern extension of the system research is manifested in bioethics while building models of relationship (Mescheryakova, 2009) and volunteerism (Evdokimov, Kuznetsov, Melik-Gaykazyan, & Melik-Gaykazyan, 2016a; Melik-Gaykazyan, Melik-Gaykazyan, Mescheryakova & Sokolova, 2016;Evdokimov, Kuznetsov, Melik-Gaykazyan, & Melik-Gaykazyan, 2016b;Ardashkin, Martyushev, Bezborodov & Valeriy, 2015). The model, built within the framework of the information-synergetic approach, uncovers correspondence between the forms of culture and its systemic functions (Rogotneva, Melik-Haikazyan & Goncharenko, 2015;Ardashkin, 2015).…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Volunteerism As Indicator Of Social, Economic And Emotional Wellbeing

Gorbuleva¹

2018

The European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Sciences

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Some types and directions of charity and volunteerism as donations, volunteerism, direct aid to beneficiaries are examined in the given work. The activity of animal welfare organizations and some organizations, as well as manifestations of ethical and legal problems in the animal welfare area, are analyzed. The primary principles and rules of bioethics correspond to the primary values of volunteerism.Bioethics, while forcing to change one's attitude to another, represents a change of human's attitude to himself and his life. Such behavior algorithms as compensation and adaptation are discussed from the bioethical point of view, having in mind the model of the information-synergetic approach. The phenomenon of degustation as an opportunity to implement different social algorithms is described.Degustation is also working in the volunteerism area. Owing to this phenomenon, volunteers have a chance to test themselves in different roles. Social, economic and emotional levels of volunteerism and charity, as well as the way these characteristics represent the status of one or another sphere, are discussed. A phenomenon of a "creative class" in modern culture is marked as one of conditions of the preliminary motivation of the volunteer. Social egoism is manifested in denial of cultural traditions, and social altruism is manifested in creations of the science's future.

show abstract

“…The model is developed by Irina V. Melik-Gaykazyan Evdokimov et al, 2016b;Melik-Gaykazyan, Tarasenko et al, 2017) within the information-synergetic approach closely related to the system approach in the Russian tradition (Melik-Gaykazyan, 2010). The model allows one to present the trajectories of effects of normative, verbal, prognostic, critical, adaptive and compensatory functions.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Visual Perception Of Artefact: Significance Of Museum In Bioethical Education

Первушина¹

2018

The European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Sciences

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A combination of several specific characteristics of modern times makes bioethical education necessary. First, visual presentation of information largely replaced the verbal one. Secondly, life itself became a product of technology, so it turned into an artefact. Thirdly, the pace of innovation reveals how frail the intellectual traditions are. Fourth, the innovations of convergent and biomedical technologies create new risks. And, finally, existence in the environment of new risks requires a new degree of responsibility for choice made by an individual. In this case, an individual must make both bodily and mental choice again and again. Bioethics is placed at the intersection of some trends: it protects the individuality from the arbitrariness of a biomedical operation, assess the new risks, retains the moral positions of philosophical traditions for determining the permissible limits of intervention of the artificial into the natural. From this perspective, the work is aimed to find an answer to the question, is it possible to adapt theories of perception of visual information to bioethical education in principle. For this purpose, the role of a museum in forming an attitude to unique artefacts is considered. By the example of the museum, an optimal combination of methods of psychological influence for developing the perception of visual information is shown. Based on this, it was concluded that the museum, which meets the abovementioned requirements, is suitable for bioethical education.

show abstract

Semiotic Interpretation of Lotka–Volterra Model and its Usage in Knowledge Management

Cited by 7 publications

References 11 publications

Neuropedagogy And Bioethics' Symbolism: Place In Knowledge Management

Neuropedagogy And Bioethics' Symbolism: Place In Knowledge Management

Volunteerism As Indicator Of Social, Economic And Emotional Wellbeing

Visual Perception Of Artefact: Significance Of Museum In Bioethical Education

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About