Contemporary metallic drug-eluting stents are associated with very good 1-year outcomes but an ongoing risk of stent-related adverse events (thrombosis, myocardial infarction, restenosis) after 1 year. The pathogenesis of these very late events is likely related to the permanent presence of the metal stent frame or polymer. Bioresorbable scaffolds have been developed to provide drug delivery and mechanical support functions similar to metallic drug-eluting stents, followed by complete resorption with recovery of more normal vascular structure and function, potentially improving very late clinical outcomes. A first-generation bioresorbable scaffold has been demonstrated to be noninferior to a contemporary metallic drug-eluting stents for overall 1-year patient-oriented and device-oriented outcomes. Increased rates of scaffold thrombosis and target vessel-related myocardial infarction were noted that may be mitigated by improved patient and lesion selection, procedural technique, and device iteration. Large-scale, randomized, clinical trials are ongoing to determine the long-term relative efficacy and safety of bioresorbable scaffolds compared with current metallic drug-eluting stents.
Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffolds for Coronary Revascularization© 2016 American Heart Association, Inc.Key Words: angioplasty ◼ revascularization ◼ stents Correspondence to: Dean J. Kereiakes, MD, The Christ Hospital, Heart and Vascular Center, Lindner Research Center, 2123 Auburn Ave, Ste 424, Cincinnati, OH 45219. E-mail lindner@thechristhospital.com W ith the progressive evolution of percutaneous coronary intervention from balloon angioplasty to bare metal stents to drug-eluting stents (DES), early coronary occlusion and restenosis rates have progressively declined.1,2 Iterations in metallic DES, including novel alloy composition, reduced strut thickness, and improved polymer biocompatibility and bioresorption, have further improved 1-year outcomes. 3,4 However, concerns about incomplete endothelialization, polymer hypersensitivity, neoatherosclerosis, and stent fracture persist, and beyond the first year of implantation, even the best metallic DES are associated with a 2% to 4% annual incidence of target lesion failure (TLF; composite of cardiac-related death, target vessel-related myocardial infarction [TVMI], or ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization), similar to the very late rates observed with bare metal stents and first-generation DES. [4][5][6] The pathophysiological mechanism underlying these very late events may be the common presence of a metallic implant that mechanically distorts and constrains the vessel, preventing coronary vasomotion, autoregulation, and adaptive coronary remodeling. Permanent metal and polymer implants may also result in chronic inflammation, neoatherosclerosis, and strut fracture. 4 Thus, once the stent has completed its intended tasks of sealing dissections, preventing acute recoil and constrictive remodeling, and inhibiting restenosis (in the case of DES), the permanent pre...