Servant Leadership: Setting the Stage for Empirical Research

Farling, Myra L.; Stone, A. Gregory; Winston, Bruce E.

doi:10.1177/107179199900600104

Cited by 256 publications

(190 citation statements)

References 33 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

168

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Many experts claimed that the importance of leadership spirituality in building the morality and characters of their subordinates. It has been widely claimed that it is explicitly the responsibility of the spiritual leaders to intervene in fixing the personality and character building of employees' by empowering, showing confidence and relying on them as this will leads to greater levels of satisfaction from the job that results in the vision accomplishment of the organizations (Wilkes, 1998, Russell, 2001, Block, 1993Greenleaf, 1977& Farling et al, 1999. Many cooperates of USA are too seeking the means and measures of spirituality.…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Work spirituality in Banking Managers and its impact on Job Satisfaction.

Usman¹,

danush²

2010

IBR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Work spirituality has become a significant aspect of organizational culture in most of the business organizations today. The values of spirituality greatly enhance the sense of accomplishment in employees' which resultantly impacts on the overall productivity and growth of the organizations. For the purpose of study, the responses of 121 Branch managers , Area managers and Regional managers are recorded on an independent spirituality assessment scale (iSAS) developed by Rojas (2002).The results have shown a significant impact of spirituality on job satisfaction. The managerial implications, limitations and future guide lines for research have also been discussed.

show abstract

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Work spirituality in Banking Managers and its impact on Job Satisfaction.

Usman¹,

danush²

2010

IBR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Service attributes were mentioned by (Farling et al, 1999;Russell and Stone, 2002;and Patterson (2003 Step 2 -Instrument development process Seven-point rating scale was used in the questionnaire of this study. The reason of using this scale is it was applied by many researchers in survey research (Davis et al, 1989; Moon and Kim, 2001; Venkatesh and Davis, 2000).…”

Section: F) Develop Visionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Exploring Servant Leadership Instrument for Social Enterprise (Cooperative)

Latiff¹,

Majid²,

Mohamad³

2017

Europ. j. multidiscip. stud.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The purpose of this paper is to describe the development and validation of a multi-dimensional instrument to measure servant leadership in social enterprise (cooperative) context. Based on an extensive literature review, expert's judgment and Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA), 57 items were formulated and only 27 items yielding to five factors: doing right things, develop vision with others, democratic, develop others potential and develop community. The construct develops purposely for social enterprise (cooperative). The participants of the study consisted random sample of the cooperative's manager in Malaysia.

show abstract

“…Greenleaf expanded the field of leadership research, asking if the leader can exercise his/her power as a source to serve others, and as a possibility to create the serving organization. According to Russel (2001), this was a strong call to draw the attention of scholars to qualities and values of a servant leader (Russel, 2001), to suggest models of behavior (Buchen, 1998;Patterson, 2003;Winston, 2003;Wong & Page, 2003), to compare servant leadership with other leadership theories (Farling, Stone & Winston, 1999;Stone, Russell & Patterson, 2004;Winston & Hartsfield, 2004), to provide the typology of servant leadership (Laub, 1999), to explain it's practical implications (Greenleaf, 1997;Sendjaya & Sarros, 2002;Spears, 2010;Winston &Hartsfield, 2004), etc. The relevance of servant leadership theory was empasized by , who claimed, that paradigm of traditional hierarchical pyramid of power has changed.…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

The relationship between school principals and teachers servant leadership

Pilkienė

2017

PROSOC

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The theory of servant leadership is one of the recognized modern approaches to leadership phenomenon, but more empirical evidence is needed to develop this concept further. Little research of servant leadership is done in the research field of educational leadership in various contexts. In this paper the analysis is made, establishing the connection between the school principals' and teachers' servant leadership in Lithuanian educational context. The literature analysis reveals, that there is an interaction between school principals' and teachers' servant leadership. The model of Van Dierendonck and Nuijten (2011) was taken as a basis for research. The quantitative empirical research was conducted, which involved participation of heads of schools, teachers and pupils in the survey (N= 889). Statistical factor analysis and regression analysis were made. The results of the analysis revealed that servant leadership construct in Lithuanian schools differs from Van Dierendonck and Nuijten (2011) theoretical model. New factor of teachers servant leadership constructdevelopment/coaching -was added.

show abstract

Servant Leadership: Setting the Stage for Empirical Research

Cited by 256 publications

References 33 publications

Work spirituality in Banking Managers and its impact on Job Satisfaction.

Work spirituality in Banking Managers and its impact on Job Satisfaction.

Exploring Servant Leadership Instrument for Social Enterprise (Cooperative)

The relationship between school principals and teachers servant leadership

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About