2006
DOI: 10.2224/sbp.2006.34.2.161
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Shame-Focused Coping: An Empirical Study of the Compass of Shame

Abstract: The way in which one copes with, or defends against, shame has important implications. The Compass of Shame (Nathanson, 1992) is a conceptual model consisting of four shame-coping styles: Attack Self, Withdrawal, Attack Other, and Avoidance. Participants rated the frequency with which they employed each of the shame-coping scripts across eight categories of shameinducing situations as described by Nathanson. The scripts were consistently applied across situations and the ratings were stable over time. A diffe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
49
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
2
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…SDDS. To quantify the SDDS assessment systematically, participants were first introduced to examples of shameful experiences by filling out the Compass of Shame Scale (CoSS) (51), which sketches four shame-eliciting scenarios and makes an inventory of responses. The CoSS was implemented immediately before the SDDS assessment to facilitate reminiscences of personal shameful experiences.…”
Section: Questionnairesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SDDS. To quantify the SDDS assessment systematically, participants were first introduced to examples of shameful experiences by filling out the Compass of Shame Scale (CoSS) (51), which sketches four shame-eliciting scenarios and makes an inventory of responses. The CoSS was implemented immediately before the SDDS assessment to facilitate reminiscences of personal shameful experiences.…”
Section: Questionnairesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent experimental study has shown that trait shame was linked with emotional suppression (Lanteigne, Flynn, Eastabrook, & Hollenstein, 2014). This is important, because adopting maladaptive emotion regulation strategies for shame may ultimately lead to both internalizing (e.g., psychological distress) and externalizing (e.g., aggression) psychopathological symptoms (Elison, Pulos, & Lennon, 2006;Velotti et al, 2014). Therefore, it is possible that shame is associated with maladaptive emotion regulation, which in turn may explain the associations that shame has with psychopathological symptoms and aggression.…”
Section: Shame and Emotion Regulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, because facilitated processing has been conceptualized as cognitive avoidance of the semantic content in order to avoid becoming overwhelmed by intrusive thoughts related to it (Constans, McCloskey, Vasterling, Bailey, & Mathews, 2004; Kyrios & Iob, 1998), an individual who experiences covert (“bypassed”) shame may process shame-relevant stimuli in a facilitated manner. Because avoidance is a primary maintenance factor in PTSD and avoidance (or “bypassing”) of shame-related cognitions is thought to serve as a means for coping with shame (Elison, Pulos, & Lennon, 2006), this effect may be especially prominent among individuals with more severe PTSD. Such processing could accelerate negative appraisals of ambiguous social situations and serve as an initial step in a cascade of processes that contribute to IPV perpetration.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%