2014
DOI: 10.1017/s095252381300031x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Short-wavelength cone-opponent retinal ganglion cells in mammals

Abstract: In all of the mammalian species studied to date, the short-wavelength-sensitive (S) cones and the S-cone bipolar cells that receive their input are very similar, but the retinal ganglion cells that receive synapses from the S-cone bipolar cells appear to be quite different. Here, we review the literature on mammalian retinal ganglion cells that respond selectively to stimulation of S-cones and respond with opposite polarity to longer wavelength stimuli. There are at least three basic mechanisms to generate the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
36
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 87 publications
2
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4-6) was not predicted from BCs, which instead displayed an approximately balanced mix of blue-On and -Off circuits (Zimmermann et al, 2018). The near-complete absence of blue-On signals in zebrafish RGCs is also in stark contrast to the importance of multiple blue-On RGC circuits in mammals (Marshak and Mills, 2014;Mills et al, 2014) including in primates (Calkins et al, 1998;Dacey, 1996;Dacey and Lee, 1994). Next, while many of the dominant spectral opponencies observed in RGCs (Fig.…”
Section: Figure 11 | Putative 'Prey-capture-rgcs' Revealed Following mentioning
confidence: 91%
“…4-6) was not predicted from BCs, which instead displayed an approximately balanced mix of blue-On and -Off circuits (Zimmermann et al, 2018). The near-complete absence of blue-On signals in zebrafish RGCs is also in stark contrast to the importance of multiple blue-On RGC circuits in mammals (Marshak and Mills, 2014;Mills et al, 2014) including in primates (Calkins et al, 1998;Dacey, 1996;Dacey and Lee, 1994). Next, while many of the dominant spectral opponencies observed in RGCs (Fig.…”
Section: Figure 11 | Putative 'Prey-capture-rgcs' Revealed Following mentioning
confidence: 91%
“…45,46 Multi-electrode recordings in the macaque far peripheral retina find weak S-cone input to OFF midget RGCs, consistent with non-selective input from S-OFF and L/M-OFF midget bipolar cells; 32 however, pure S-cone center, OFF midget RGCs have remained elusive in single cell electrophysiology 20,48,69 and electroretinography. 43,44 The discrepancies in evidence for S-OFF midget RGCs may be due to differences in species, 52 retinal eccentricity and methodology, thus, here, we sought both anatomical and physiological confirmation in the macaque retina. Because color vision, 53 spatial acuity 71 and midget RGC response properties vary considerably with eccentricity, 65 we focused our efforts on the central retina where our research is most relevant to human visual perception.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One cone pigment has a peak sensitivity at about 510 nm, and the other is maximally sensitive in the ultraviolet with a peak at about 370 nm [29]. Color opponency as described above has also been found in mice [30]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%