1991
DOI: 10.1109/16.78393
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simple analytical expressions for the fringing field and fringing-field-induced transfer time in charge-coupled devices

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This result has been also reported in [4] where a 2-D analytical solution predicts a very sharp decline of the horizontal potential gradient as a function of depth. Therefore for a monochromatic source the number of photons interacting between two flat surfaces, the Si -Si02 interface and the bottom of the depletion region, can be expressed simply as:…”
Section: A Variable Voltage Methodssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…This result has been also reported in [4] where a 2-D analytical solution predicts a very sharp decline of the horizontal potential gradient as a function of depth. Therefore for a monochromatic source the number of photons interacting between two flat surfaces, the Si -Si02 interface and the bottom of the depletion region, can be expressed simply as:…”
Section: A Variable Voltage Methodssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…The most widely used such abstraction is the threshold voltage Vi . We therefore proceed by choosing a nominal threshold voltage of the form (9.13) The actual threshold voltage will be lower than the nominal one by the amount of drain-induced barrier lowering (DIEL) (24)(25)(26)(27). In this study, I use the expression given by Fjeldly and Shur (28]:…”
Section: Threshold Scalingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Analytical approximations for the fringing fields in CCD's have been developed and can be calculated by following Bakker. 15 Our present devices have gates which are 3-4 times wider than the depth of the channels, and thus the fringing fields are weak. For narrower gates the fringing fields are increased and negligible trapping is expected, even at much lower temperatures.…”
mentioning
confidence: 81%