2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0020-7403(01)00083-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Simulation of springback

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

8
148
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 278 publications
(183 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
8
148
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The blank is meshed with two layers of elements through thickness, leading to four through-thickness integration points. The average in-plane element size (turning angle \ 10°of die radius) guarantee accurate results with the solid element for the forming phase (Li et al 2002). Since the selected geometry presents small springback values, the two layers of elements lead to accurate results (Oliveira et al 2008).…”
Section: Rectangular Cup Examplementioning
confidence: 98%
“…The blank is meshed with two layers of elements through thickness, leading to four through-thickness integration points. The average in-plane element size (turning angle \ 10°of die radius) guarantee accurate results with the solid element for the forming phase (Li et al 2002). Since the selected geometry presents small springback values, the two layers of elements lead to accurate results (Oliveira et al 2008).…”
Section: Rectangular Cup Examplementioning
confidence: 98%
“…As springback can produce unexpected geometric errors, it can cause difficulties when assembling deformed parts. Therefore, a large amount of research has been conducted on springback prediction and compensation in terms of experiments and simulations [7][8][9][10]. These valuablevalued achievements have helped people obtain a better understanding of this unique phenomenon.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Papeleux and Ponthot (2002) investigated the effect on springback from e.g., blank holder force, the coefficient of friction, and the choice of time discretisation in the solution process. Li et al (2002) studied how element formulation, the number of through-thickness integration points, and tool radius versus blank thickness affected the springback. Wagoner and Li (2007) studied the role of the number of through-thickness integration points by comparing the analytical and numerical integration of bending moments in the bending-under-tension of a beam.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%