2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2020.124862
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Single metal isotherm study of the ion exchange removal of Cu(II), Fe(II), Pb(II) and Zn(II) from synthetic acetic acid leachate

Abstract: This is a repository copy of Single metal isotherm study of the ion exchange removal of Cu(II), Fe(II), Pb(II) and Zn(II) from synthetic acetic acid leachate.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A promising alternative may be a resin-in-pulp (RIP) process, in which the functionality of the chosen ion-exchange resin can be tailored to complement the alternative leaching chemistry. It is known for example that in weak acid (acetate) media, the analogous iminodiacetate resins are highly effective at adsorbing metals as acetate complexes [74,75]. Thiourea resins are commercially available and known for high gold extraction capabilities [76].…”
Section: Considerations For Industrial Implementationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A promising alternative may be a resin-in-pulp (RIP) process, in which the functionality of the chosen ion-exchange resin can be tailored to complement the alternative leaching chemistry. It is known for example that in weak acid (acetate) media, the analogous iminodiacetate resins are highly effective at adsorbing metals as acetate complexes [74,75]. Thiourea resins are commercially available and known for high gold extraction capabilities [76].…”
Section: Considerations For Industrial Implementationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[20][21][22][23]. There are common conventional methods for removing heavy metals from water, such as ion exchange [24], solvent extraction [25], reverse osmosis [26], chemical precipitation [27], etc. However, these techniques are either prohibitively expensive or ineffective in terms of achieving high removal efficacy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditional techniques such as reverse osmosis, electrodialysis, ultrafiltration, the industrial ion-exchange process, and chemical precipitation are used to remove heavy metals from industrial wastewater [31][32][33]. Unfortunately, the majority of these commonly used methods are constrained by critical barriers such as low selectivity, high cost, inefficient removal, significant energy consumption, and the inability to handle massive amounts of hazardous waste [34,35].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%