2012
DOI: 10.1080/00207543.2010.543175
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Six sigma, absorptive capacity and organisational learning orientation

Abstract: The importance of the Six Sigma methodology in industry is growing constantly. However, there are few empirical studies that analyze the advantages of this methodology and its positive effects on organizational performance. The purpose of this paper is to extend understanding of the success of Six Sigma quality management initiatives by investigating the effects of Six Sigma teamwork and process management on absorptive capacity. It also seeks to understand the relation between absorptive capacity and organiza… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

5
49
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 85 publications
(140 reference statements)
5
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite the positive relationship often found in research (e.g., Braunscheidel et al, 2011;Choi et al, 2012;Shafer and Moeller, 2012;Swink and Jacobs, 2012), a significant controversy about the real benefits Current research efforts are thus devoted to analyzing the relationship between Six Sigma and knowledge management. Results show positive relationships between Six Sigma and variables such as organizational learning (e.g., Choo et al, 2007;Llorens and Molina, 2006;Malik and Blumenfeld, 2012;Wiklund and Wiklund, 2002), knowledge creation (e.g., Anand et al, 2010;Choo et al, 2007), absorptive capacity (e.g., Gutierrez Bustinza and Barrales- Molina, 2012;McAdam and Hazlett, 2010), and shared vision (Gutierrez, Llorens-Montes and Bustinza, 2009;Malik and Blumenfeld, 2012). The variable knowledge transfer has received no attention in the Six Sigma literature but is a promising focus for research due to the important benefits associated with this process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Despite the positive relationship often found in research (e.g., Braunscheidel et al, 2011;Choi et al, 2012;Shafer and Moeller, 2012;Swink and Jacobs, 2012), a significant controversy about the real benefits Current research efforts are thus devoted to analyzing the relationship between Six Sigma and knowledge management. Results show positive relationships between Six Sigma and variables such as organizational learning (e.g., Choo et al, 2007;Llorens and Molina, 2006;Malik and Blumenfeld, 2012;Wiklund and Wiklund, 2002), knowledge creation (e.g., Anand et al, 2010;Choo et al, 2007), absorptive capacity (e.g., Gutierrez Bustinza and Barrales- Molina, 2012;McAdam and Hazlett, 2010), and shared vision (Gutierrez, Llorens-Montes and Bustinza, 2009;Malik and Blumenfeld, 2012). The variable knowledge transfer has received no attention in the Six Sigma literature but is a promising focus for research due to the important benefits associated with this process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The first variation is composed of Champions, Master Black Belts (MBB), Black Belts (BB) and Green Belts (GB) (Hahn, 2005;Buch & Tolentino, 2006;Gutiérrez et al, 2012). The second one has the following formation: Champions, Black Belts (BB) and Green Belts (GB) (Schroeder et al, 2008;Calia et al, 2009;Laux et al, 2014), with the difference regarding the non-use of MBB.…”
Section: Six Sigma Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the various types of collaborative networks, self-organizing networks stand out for their no centralized management, the intense participation of those involved, their ability to keep their development without significant external interference and the ability to promote the learning of all those involved in the network through the systematization and availability of the knowledge generated (Kash & Rycoft, 2000;Rycroft & Kash, 2004;Dutta et al, 2005;Wagner & Leydesdorff, 2005;Schuh et al, 2008). Gutiérrez et al (2012) claim that the Six Sigma program of an organization can be considered as a learning network, providing an organizational structure composed of a network of professionals who work together oriented towards projects. However, the analysis of the Six Sigma program as a network should not limit itself to the learning, thus covering the other benefits provided by the formation of a collaborative network, in particular a self-organizing network.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…He found that absorptive capacity mediated the relationship between strategic orientation and organisational performance. Gutié rrez et al, (2010) studied the relation between absorptive capacity and organizational learning in a -total quality management (TQM) context. They ISSN 2162-4860 2017 found that a positive and significant relationship exists between absorptive capacity and organizational learning orientation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%