Skills and Limitations of the Adiabatic Omega Equation: How Effective Is It to Retrieve Oceanic Vertical Circulation at Mesoscale and Submesoscale?

Abstract

The quasi-geostrophic and the generalized omega equations are the most widely used methods to reconstruct vertical velocity (w) from in-situ data. As observational networks with much higher spatial and temporal resolutions are being designed, the question rises of identifying the approximations and scales at which an accurate estimation of w through the omega equation can be achieved and what are the critical scales and observables needed. In this paper we test different adiabatic omega reconstructions of w over several regions representative of main oceanic regimes of the global ocean in a fully eddy-resolving numerical simulation with a 1=60o horizontal resolution. We find that the best reconstructions are observed in conditions characterized by energetic turbulence and/or weak stratification where near-surface frontal processes are felt deep into the ocean interior. The quasi-geostrophic omega equation gives satisfactory results for scales larger than ~ 10 km horizontally while the improvements using a generalized formulation are substantial only in conditions where frontal turbulent processes are important (providing improvements with satisfactory reconstruction skill down to ~ 5 km in scale). The main sources of uncertainties that could be identified are related to processes responsible for ocean thermal wind imbalance (TWI), which is particularly difficult to account for (especially in observation-based studies) and to the deep flow which is generally improperly accounted for in omega reconstructions through the bottom boundary condition. Nevertheless, the reconstruction of mesoscale vertical velocities may be sufficient to estimate vertical fluxes of oceanic properties in many cases of practical interest.

Dynamics of the Atlantic Marine Intertropical Convergence Zone

“…As mentioned in Pietri et al. (2021), there has not yet been much study on this term. The turbulent momentum Q ‐vector Q d takes into account the turbulent momentum flux $$\vec{\tau }$$ and modifies the vertical shear of horizontal wind by turbulence. The β Q ‐vector can be expressed as $${\vec{Q}}_{\beta }=\beta v{\vec{\zeta }}_{ph}$$ (with $${\vec{\zeta }}_{ph}\left(-\frac{\partial v}{\partial z},\frac{\partial u}{\partial z}\right)$$ the horizontal pseudovorticity). As consequence, Q β changes the vertical shear of the wind when the meridional wind ( v ) transports $${\vec{\zeta }}_{ph}$$.…”

The Oceans’ Biological Carbon Pumps: Framework for a Research Observational Community Approach

“…Comprehensive understanding and quantification of this pump require high-resolution transects of POC with towed instruments (Stukel et al, 2017) or gliders (Omand et al, 2015) to evidence anomalies along vertical profiles (e.g., increases in POC and/or O 2 content at a given depth horizon that are not due to a deep chlorophyll maximum). Converting the POC anomalies in the water column into POC fluxes from such observations requires additional constraints on vertical velocities that are difficult to estimate from observations (Pietri et al, 2021) and are generally derived from models (Omand et al, 2015;Stukel et al, 2017).…”

The Impact of Fine-Scale Currents on Biogeochemical Cycles in a Changing Ocean

“…Mesoscale and submesoscale dynamics can be modeled accurately with the hydrostatic, Boussinesq equations that form the core of Ocean General Circulation Models (OGCMs) (Mahadevan & Tandon 2006). They emerge when the horizontal grid spacing used to solve the model equations has kilometer-scale (Capet et al 2008, Lévy et al 2012b, Pietri et al 2021. But finescales are not explicitly resolved when OGCMs are embedded within Earth System Models (ESMs) used for biogeochemical climate projections (Bopp et al 2013), which involve long and global simulations, because computational capabilities limit grid spacing.…”