2019
DOI: 10.1587/elex.16.20190293
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Snake: An asynchronous pipeline for ultra-low-power applications

Abstract: Voltage scaling is an effective technique for ultra-low-power applications. However, PVT variation degrades the robust of traditional synchronous pipelines severely when voltage scales into the sub-threshold region. In this paper, we propose a register-based bundled-data asynchronous pipeline that can operate robustly in sub-threshold, called Snake. By looping the match delay line, the Snake halves the design overhead compared to other asynchronous pipelines. We also propose a practical asynchronous design met… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 31 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In [20], synchronizers and one-hot coding are used to implement mixed-clock domain FIFOs, enabling communication between synchronous or asynchronous chips. It is worth noting that in [21] , although the asynchronous protocol demonstrates resilience to PVT variations, the latency associated with the handshake could adversely impact overall system performance. Asynchronous protocols could be further categorized into two types: two-phase and four-phase bundleddata protocols [22], with the bundled-data circuit representing the most cost-effective design option.In contrast, [23] highlighted that asynchronous FIFOs required more control logic than synchronous FIFOs, as their signal processing was not reliant on clock signals.…”
Section: Asynchronous Fifos Communication In Asynchronousmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [20], synchronizers and one-hot coding are used to implement mixed-clock domain FIFOs, enabling communication between synchronous or asynchronous chips. It is worth noting that in [21] , although the asynchronous protocol demonstrates resilience to PVT variations, the latency associated with the handshake could adversely impact overall system performance. Asynchronous protocols could be further categorized into two types: two-phase and four-phase bundleddata protocols [22], with the bundled-data circuit representing the most cost-effective design option.In contrast, [23] highlighted that asynchronous FIFOs required more control logic than synchronous FIFOs, as their signal processing was not reliant on clock signals.…”
Section: Asynchronous Fifos Communication In Asynchronousmentioning
confidence: 99%