2017
DOI: 10.1093/biosci/bix051
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Society Is Ready for a New Kind of Science—Is Academia?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
56
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
56
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Society increasingly demands that scientists demonstrate the positive impacts from their work, and the university sector is beginning to respond (Boswell and Smith, 2017;Sivertsen, 2017). It is, however, likely that scientists will need to balance the conflicting pressures of demonstrating impact and 'publish or perish' for the foreseeable future (Keeler et al, 2017;Tyler, 2017;Wittemyer et al, 2018). ECRs offer a wealth of experiences, insights and expertise that may be missed if only senior, tenured scientists are supported and encouraged to engage with policy processes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Society increasingly demands that scientists demonstrate the positive impacts from their work, and the university sector is beginning to respond (Boswell and Smith, 2017;Sivertsen, 2017). It is, however, likely that scientists will need to balance the conflicting pressures of demonstrating impact and 'publish or perish' for the foreseeable future (Keeler et al, 2017;Tyler, 2017;Wittemyer et al, 2018). ECRs offer a wealth of experiences, insights and expertise that may be missed if only senior, tenured scientists are supported and encouraged to engage with policy processes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We were inspired to write this perspective from our own experiences as ECRs trying to have a positive impact on policy and practice, whilst operating within the institutional constraints of the university sector which still largely incentivises the 'traditional' academic model of publish or perish (Keeler et al, 2017;Tyler, 2017;Wittemyer et al, 2018). We were also emboldened by the positive feedback we received from ECRs who attended a recent forum that aimed to help Australian environmental scientists understand the practical ways in which they can, at an individual level, influence policy and practice 2 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Actionable research may be best enabled through co-development of research programs with diverse communities and collaborators with close attention to emerging policy windows Moon et al 2014;Rose 2014;Beier et al 2017;Keeler et al 2017;Rose et al 2017) rather than the classic approach of testing scientific theory that is often taught in university (Palmer et al 2005;Keeler et al 2017). Collaboration among scientists and lawyers, government agencies, Indigenous peoples, and stakeholders can enable the early identification of specific data gaps or uncertainties that will be relevant to environmental policy windows (Sutherland et al 2012;Adams et al 2014;Cook et al 2014).…”
Section: Moore Et Almentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Importantly, the science-law interface is a comfort zone for many NGOs and Indigenous governments, which can help foster law-science linkages. Indeed, diverse career pathways can be well suited to address the law-science gap that may be enabled by interdisciplinary training (Keeler et al 2017;Zavaleta et al 2017). …”
Section: Fostering Law-science Linkagesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another feature of this study is its transdisciplinary approach [22,23], which is promoted as the basic framework of the Future Earth Program [24]. Transdisciplinary research facilitates the integration of various traditional academic disciplines to solve serious real-world problems (i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%