Sonographic model parameters of kidney in men and women endo-mesomorphic somatotype depending on the anthropometric indices characteristics

Abstract

The application of the mathematical method for establishing quantitative relationshipsbetween the set of anthropometric parameters and sonographic parameters of thepatient allows in some cases to significantly improve early diagnosis of diseases, makeit not only timely, but accurate. The purpose of the work is to analyze the regressionmodels of individual sonographic sizes of the kidneys in practically healthy men andwomen of the endo-mesomorphic somatotype, depending on the peculiarities of thestructure and size of the body. Sonographic renal research conducted using ultrasonicdiagnostic system "CAPASEE" SSA-220A (Toshiba, Japan). For each kidney, the length,width (transverse size) and front and rear dimensions were determined; the area of thelongitudinal and transverse sections of the kidneys and their sinuses, as well as thevolume of the right and left kidneys. All of them had an anthropometric survey conductedby V.V. Bunak in the modification of P. P. Shapаrenko. The evaluation of thesomatotype was carried out according to the mathematical scheme of J. Carter and B.Heath. Determining the absolute amount of fat, bone and muscle components of bodyweight was calculated by the formula J. Matiegka and the muscular component - bythe formulas of the American Institute of Nutrition. For the construction of models ofindividual sonographic parameters of the kidneys, the method of stepwise regressionanalysis in the package "STATISTICA 6.1" was used. In practically healthy men andwomen of Podillia endo-mesomorphic somatotype of 16 possible 14 reliable regressionmodels of sonographic parameters of the right and left kidneys, based on anthropo-somatotypological indicators with a determination coefficient, from 0.767 to 0.966 andfrom 0.672 to 0.912 were constructed. The constructed models of sonographicparameters of both kidneys in men endo-mesomorphic somatotype most often includethe circumferential body dimensions (22.4%), cephalometric indices and the thicknessof skin and fat folds (17.1%), body diameters (14.5%), and longitudinal body dimensions(11.8%). The constructed models of sonographic parameters of both kidneys in womenendo-mesomorphic somatotype most often include circumferential body sizes (23.1%),body diameters (20.5%), cephalometric indices (19.2%) and thickness of skin and fatfolds (16.7%). In the analysis of entering into models of sonographic parameters of thekidneys anthropometric and somatotypological indicators, expressed manifestations ofasymmetry and sexual dimorphism

Regression models of sonographic parameters of the kidneys in practically healthy women of the ectomorphic somatotype depending on the peculiarities of body size

“…In previous studies [4,31], we found that in practically healthy women of mesomorphic somatotypes of 16 possible sonographic parameters of the right and left kidneys, based on anthropometric and somatotypological indicators, were constructed 7 reliable models with a determination coefficient from 0.607 to 0.641, and for women endo-mesomorphic somatotype -14 valid models with a determination coefficient from 0.672 to 0.912. In women of mesomorphic somatotype constructed models most often include the circumferential dimensions of the body (29.8%) and cephalometric indices (19.1%).…”

Modeling of sonographic parameters of the kidneys in practically healthy women of the middle intermediate somatotype depending on the constitutional parameters of the body

“…In previous studies [4,27,28] we determined that from 16 possible sonographic parameters of the kidneys, based on the anthropometric and somatotypological indices in practically healthy women of the mesomorphic somatotype, 7 reliable models with a determination coefficient from 0.607 to 0.641 were constructed; in women of ectomorphic somatotype -all 16 models with a determination coefficient from 0.607 to 0.973; in women endo-mesomorphic somatotype -14 models with a determination coefficient from 0.672 to 0.912. The most frequently constructed models included: women with mesomorphic somatotypecircumferential body dimensions (29.8%) and cephalometric indexes (19.1%); in women with ectomorphic somatotype body diameters (24.2%), body girth sizes (20.9%), cephalometric indices (19.8%) and thickness of skin and fat folds (14.3%); in women of the endo-mesomorphic somatotype, the cephalometric indexes (to the right kidney 24.2%, to the left kidney 15.6%), body diameters (to the right kidney 24.2%, to the left kidney 17.8%) and the circumferential body size (to the right kidney 24.2%, to left kidney 22.2%), and also only to the left kidney thickness of skin and fat folds (17.8%).…”

Somatotype Characteristics of Patients with Non-Dialysis Chronic Kidney Disease and its Relationships with Physical Activity and Depression

“…However, somatotype could also be an important measurement parameter for the risk of CKD. To the best of our knowledge, although only one study has analysed the sonographic model parameters of patients with endomesoporic kidneys for anthropometric index characteristics, no studies were found that directly assessed the somatotype characteristics of patients with CKD (Ustymenko, 2018).…”