2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.snb.2016.06.113
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sorption/desorption hysteresis of thin-film humidity sensors based on graphene oxide and its derivative

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Synergistic reinforcement of mechanical interlocking and hydrogen bonding led to a dramatic increase in the tensile strength and Young’s modulus by 98.3% and 87%, respectively, at 7.5 wt% GO loading of PEI and the composite film showed robust humidity sensing performance over the RH range of 40–90%. Both Su’s group and Lee’s group studied amine-modified graphene oxide as sensing materials in humidity sensors, and demonstrated that the amine modification could improve the sensitivity towards humidity change, but may bring hysteresis-induced errors due to the interaction between water molecules and amine groups [157,158]. Wang et al proposed supramolecularly modified graphene naphthalene-1-sulfonic acid sodium salt and silver nanoparticles (Ag-NA-rGO), and the resulting supramolecular composite-based humidity sensor exhibited an excellent sensing performance between 11% and 95%, including an ultrafast response and recovery time of <1 s, and a high sensitivity and stability, which was attributed to the large surface area and wide interlayer spacing in the supramolecular composite [159].…”
Section: Humidity Sensors Based On Graphene Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Synergistic reinforcement of mechanical interlocking and hydrogen bonding led to a dramatic increase in the tensile strength and Young’s modulus by 98.3% and 87%, respectively, at 7.5 wt% GO loading of PEI and the composite film showed robust humidity sensing performance over the RH range of 40–90%. Both Su’s group and Lee’s group studied amine-modified graphene oxide as sensing materials in humidity sensors, and demonstrated that the amine modification could improve the sensitivity towards humidity change, but may bring hysteresis-induced errors due to the interaction between water molecules and amine groups [157,158]. Wang et al proposed supramolecularly modified graphene naphthalene-1-sulfonic acid sodium salt and silver nanoparticles (Ag-NA-rGO), and the resulting supramolecular composite-based humidity sensor exhibited an excellent sensing performance between 11% and 95%, including an ultrafast response and recovery time of <1 s, and a high sensitivity and stability, which was attributed to the large surface area and wide interlayer spacing in the supramolecular composite [159].…”
Section: Humidity Sensors Based On Graphene Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, humidity hysteresis—another criterion that is commonly used to estimate the reliability of humidity sensors—was also tested for PIL-Br sensors with varying thickness. The humidity hysteresis is defined as the maximum difference of the humidity sensor between the adsorption and desorption process [26]; thus, the humidity hysteresis was calculated to be 3.2% RH (Figure 4c), 4.3% RH (Figure 4f) and 5.2% RH (Figure 4i) for PIL-Br-10, PIL-Br-20 and PIL-Br-30 within the working range of 11%–98% RH, respectively. This result can further confirm the good reliability of PIL-Br humidity sensors.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We would also like to mention that work done by [24] has shown that multilayer graphene and graphene has alternating resistance change due to the competing effects of charge transfer and protonic conduction. Sensors which use bilayer [21] and CVD graphene [23], have higher sensitivity, but require a more complicated synthesis process, where the graphene needs to be grown on a metal catalyst layer before being transferred to the desired substrate.…”
Section: B Humidity Response Of Ncg Filmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Carbon-based sensors show promise in addressing the shortcomings of metal oxide and polymer based sensors [20]- [30]. Such sensors includes carbon nanotube (CNT) based sensors [20], [22], [31], [32], exfoliated graphene or reduced graphene oxide (rGO) based films [21], [26], polymer-graphene composite films [27], [29], [30], [33], and graphene/multilayer-Sensors-25539-2019 graphene/graphite films deposited using chemical vapour deposition (CVD) [24], [28], [34]. Carbon films with high sp 2 bonds (CNT, graphene, graphite) are known to be stable when exposed to environmental factors, such as weak acids and UV [35] [36].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%