2020
DOI: 10.1017/s1431927620001361
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sparse Scanning Electron Microscopy Data Acquisition and Deep Neural Networks for Automated Segmentation in Connectomics

Abstract: With the growing importance of three-dimensional and very large field of view imaging, acquisition time becomes a serious bottleneck. Additionally, dose reduction is of importance when imaging material like biological tissue that is sensitive to electron radiation. Random sparse scanning can be used in the combination with image reconstruction techniques to reduce the acquisition time or electron dose in scanning electron microscopy. In this study, we demonstrate a workflow that includes data acquisition on a … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Automatic segmentation using classic computer vision techniques such as image thresholding and morphology operations 3,4 is much faster and repeatable, but difficult to implement and often not robust to slight changes in imaging or sample conditions. Recently, convolutional neural networks (CNN) pre-trained on ImageNet 5 have produced superior microscopy classification and segmentation results and are much easier to implement [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16] . However, segmentation CNNs require expensively labeled training data to operate well and ImageNet pre-training does not adequately alleviate this problem when transferred to microscopy segmentation tasks because many of the learned filters are not applicable (e.g., those adapted to detect dogs).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Automatic segmentation using classic computer vision techniques such as image thresholding and morphology operations 3,4 is much faster and repeatable, but difficult to implement and often not robust to slight changes in imaging or sample conditions. Recently, convolutional neural networks (CNN) pre-trained on ImageNet 5 have produced superior microscopy classification and segmentation results and are much easier to implement [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16] . However, segmentation CNNs require expensively labeled training data to operate well and ImageNet pre-training does not adequately alleviate this problem when transferred to microscopy segmentation tasks because many of the learned filters are not applicable (e.g., those adapted to detect dogs).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The increasing demand to perform metrology at nanoscales in various branches of science and engineering has driven efforts to enhance the performance of the scanning electron microscope (SEM). Performance enhancement mainly involves increasing the throughput of the SEM [1][2][3][4] without a degradation in the output image. The main factors that determine the SEM throughput are image resolution and frame rate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach is followed in most of the machine learning-based techniques [22,23]. In recent years, the deep convolutional neural network (D-CNN) [24] has been used for image super-resolution [25] with application to microscopy [4,26,27]. D-CNN has also been used for noise reduction in low-dose CT [28], x-ray imaging [29], and MRI [30].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Because of fast beam re-positioning, an arbitrary distribution of pixel locations has negligible impact on scanning time. Therefore, for an image where only 5% of pixels need scanning, one can ideally speed up its acquisition by 20 folds [1,23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%