2012
DOI: 10.21861/hgg.2012.74.01.06
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatial Aspects of Social Distance Towards the Roma

Abstract: Cilj ovoga rada jest povezivanje socijalne distance s fizičkom, odnosno pokušaj da se odgovori na pitanje ovisi li stupanj (ne)prihvaćanja Roma o njihovoj prostornoj udaljenosti/blizini. Istraživanje je provedeno u Međimurju, regiji gdje su Romi najzastupljenija manjinska zajednica. Dobiveni rezultati pokazuju da se u uvjetima male fizičke međusobne distance, koja osigurava češći međuetnički kontakt, blizina Roma čak smanjuje stupanj prihvaćanja socijalnih odnosa s njima. Istraživanje je uključilo i mjerenje s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In Croatia, the concept of social distance has been most frequently used to analyse closeness or distance to different national/ethnic groups (Katunarić 1991;Malešević & Uzelac 1997;Malenica 2003;Banovac & Boneta 2006;Boneta et al 2013). Sometimes the concept has been used to analyse distance towards different religious groups (Previšić et al 2004;Mrnjaus 2013), sometimes only towards Roma (Šlezak & Šakaja 2012;Kalebić Maglica et al 2018), and sometimes against groups characterized as different from the dominant social matrix for some reason (i.e., drug addicts, alcoholics or criminals, people with health, physical or mental limitations etc.) (Lotar et al 2010;Vučković Juroš et al 2014;Baloban et al 2019).…”
Section: Theoretical-conceptual Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Croatia, the concept of social distance has been most frequently used to analyse closeness or distance to different national/ethnic groups (Katunarić 1991;Malešević & Uzelac 1997;Malenica 2003;Banovac & Boneta 2006;Boneta et al 2013). Sometimes the concept has been used to analyse distance towards different religious groups (Previšić et al 2004;Mrnjaus 2013), sometimes only towards Roma (Šlezak & Šakaja 2012;Kalebić Maglica et al 2018), and sometimes against groups characterized as different from the dominant social matrix for some reason (i.e., drug addicts, alcoholics or criminals, people with health, physical or mental limitations etc.) (Lotar et al 2010;Vučković Juroš et al 2014;Baloban et al 2019).…”
Section: Theoretical-conceptual Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Na primjer, na skali socijalne distance stanovništva koje živi u istom naselju sa Romima, gradacija vrijednosti prihvatanja predloženih socijalnih kontakata bila je nepravilna -odrasli radije prihvataju Rome za prijatelje, djeca za školskog druga u razredu nego za susjeda u ulici. Autori ovog istraživanja pretpostavili su da prostorna bliskost sa Romima povećava socijalnu distancu stanovnika -susjeda prema njima, ali nisu ponudili objašnjenje zašto do toga dolazi (10).…”
Section: Diskusijaunclassified