Specificity of cognitive biases in patients with current depression and remitted depression and in patients with asthma

Fritzsche, Anja; Dahme, Bernhard; Gotlib, Ian H.; Joormann, Jutta; Magnussen, H; Watz, H; Nutzinger, Detlev O.; Leupoldt, Andreas von

doi:10.1017/s0033291709990948

Cited by 121 publications

(142 citation statements)

References 56 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

116

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Moreover, these distorted cognitive processes can be found in at-risk (Dearing & Gotlib, 2009;Joormann, Talbot, & Gotlib, 2007;Kujawa et al, 2011;Taylor & Ingram, 1999) and remitted (Fritzsche et al, 2010;Gilboa & Gotlib, 1997;Hedlund & Rude, 1995;, 2010 depressed samples.…”

Section: Cognitive Biases and Vulnerability For Depressionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The combined cognitive bias hypothesis in depression

Everaert

Koster

Derakshan

2012

Clinical Psychology Review

273

179

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Drawing from substantial evidence demonstrating cognitive biases in depression at various stages of information processing (i.e., attention, interpretation, memory, cognitive control), we argue for an approach that considers the interplay among these processes. This paper attempts to apply the combined cognitive bias hypothesis (Hirsch, Mathews, & Clark, 2006) to depression research and reviews competing theoretical frameworks that have guided research in this area. We draw on current findings from behavioral studies on the interplay between depression-related processing biases. These data indicate that various cognitive biases are associated. However, it is not clear whether single or multiple biases are most predictive of depressive symptoms. We conclude this article with theoretical and clinical implications of the current state of research in this field and propose a number of ways in which research on the combined cognitive bias hypothesis can be advanced. A State-of-the-art Major depression is a prevalent psychiatric disorder that is associated with debilitating symptomatic suffering, functional impairments, and high societal costs (Kessler & Wang, 2009). Notwithstanding a range of well-established psychological and pharmacological interventions, relapse and recurrence rates of depression remain high (Vittengl, Clark, Dunn, & Jarrett, 2007) indicating that current therapies do not sufficiently address vulnerability factors for this burdensome disorder. Moreover, with each successive depressive episode the risk for recurrence increases (Boland & Keller, 2009), which points to an expanding vulnerability with multiple episodes. Hence, profound insight into the mechanisms involved in the etiology and maintenance of major depression seems essential in improving contemporary treatment options and the prevention of depression.In the past three decades, research inspired by cognitive accounts of depression has been successful in identifying vulnerability factors for this disorder. Apart from substantial research examining depressive cognitive content as a vulnerability factor (e.g., negative thoughts), a promising line of research highlights the role of cognitive biases in the development, maintenance, and relapse/recurrence of depression (for reviews see Mathews & MacLeod, 2005). Research efforts in this particular area of interest have typically focused on abnormalities in attention, interpretation, and memory processes, which are considered to be instrumental in the understanding of the processes involved in these cognitive biases. More recently, there is growing interest into cognitive and neural mechanisms underlying cognitive control impairments, which may operate across a variety of cognitive biases. Indeed a substantial number of studies on emotional information processing in depressed samples provide evidence that depression is characterized by attention, interpretation, and memory biases, especially for negative information (see below). COMBINED COGNITIVE BIAS HYPOTHESIS IN DEPRESSION 4This resea...

show abstract

Section: Cognitive Biases and Vulnerability For Depressionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The combined cognitive bias hypothesis in depression

Everaert

Koster

Derakshan

2012

Clinical Psychology Review

273

179

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…127,129,[134][135][136][137][138][139][140][141][142] Enhanced recognition of sad facial expressions has also been consistently reported in acutely depressed patients. 73,[143][144][145][146][147][148] Other studies have reported evidence of a negative bias during facial expression recognition and detection tasks, 138,140,[149][150][151][152][153][154][155][156] including a tendency to identify neutral faces as sad in patients with moderate to severe depressive symptoms compared with healthy controls. [157][158][159] This bias is accompanied by selective attention to negatively valenced faces depicting sadness 134,147,155,160 and anger.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Systematic review of the neural basis of social cognition in patients with mood disorders

Cusi

Nazarov

Holshausen

et al. 2012

J Psychiatry Neurosci

256

114

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Elliot et al, 2011;Farb et al, 2011;Fritzsche et al, 2010), a dosadašnji nalazi ukazuju na značajnu prediktivnu moć specifičnih obrazaca ove mreže u predviđanju depresivne epizode (Marchetti et al, 2013). Međutim, uprkos povećanom interesu za ispitivanje moždanih aktivnosti tokom mirovanja koristeći tehnike neuroodslikavanja, neophodna je i dalja provera neuralnih korelata kognitivnih faktora vulnerabilnosti koristeći bihejvioralne metode paradigme mirovanja, kako na uzorcima vulnerabilnih osoba, tako i na kliničkim uzorcima.…”

Section: Diskusijaunclassified

“…Pretpostavlja se da su ove mentalne aktivnosti povezane sa neuronskom mrežom mirovanja (engl. default mode network) koja je aktivna kada osoba nije fokusirana na zbivanja u spoljašnjoj sredini, već je fokusirana na misli o sebi, priseća se događaja iz prošlosti, zamišlja moguće buduće situacije ili joj "misli lutaju" (Chen et al, 2013;Elliot, Zahn, Deakin, & Anderson, 2011;Farb, Anderson, Bloch, & Segal, 2011;Fritzsche et al, 2010;Reichle & Snyder, 2007). Neuronska mreža mirovanja je jedna od tri velike neuralne mreže za koje se pretpostavlja da međusobnim delovanjem u velikoj meri učestvuju u obradi informacija tokom emocionalnih i kognitivnih procesa (Chen et al, 2013).…”

unclassified

Situacioni Činioci Afektivnog Stanja – Afektivne Promene Tokom Mirovanja I Indukcije Afekta

Sokić¹,

Milinkovic²,

Novović³

et al. 2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Većina kognitivnih modela pretpostavlja da se depresivno raspoloženje javlja kao odgovor na određeni stresni podsticaj iz sredine čak i niskog intenziteta, dok je pretpostavka neurobioloških modela da proces koji dovodi do depresivnog raspoloženja može biti pokrenut i u odsustvu bilo kakvih zahteva ili podsticaja iz okruženja. U ovom istraživanju su proveravane pretpostavke koje proističu iz dve relativno nezavisne teorijske perspektive – kognitivne i neurokognitivne, a koje se tiču situacionih činilaca koji, zavisno od nivoa vulnerabilnosti, dovode do afektivnih promena, i eventualno mogu otpočeti razvoj depresivnih simptoma. Uzorak je bio sačinjen od 72 ispitanika prosečne starosti 25 godina (SD = 4.18), uz upadljivo veću zastupljenost ispitanika ženskog (75.3%) pola. U prvoj grupi (N = 36), ispitanici su podvrgnuti standardnoj proceduri indukcije afekta koristeći muzički metod. U drugoj grupi primenjena je procedura bihejvioralne paradigme mirovanja (N = 36). Rezultati su pokazali da su obe procedure dovele do promena u raspoloženju, a dobijen je i značajan efekat interakcije eksperimentalnog uslova, vremena merenja, i vulnerabilnosti, kada je u pitanju negativni afekat. Obe eksperimentalne procedure dovele su, u obe grupe, do značajnog pada u nivou pozitivnog afekta. Promene u afektu nastupile su i kod vulnerabilnih i kod nevulnerabilnih ispitanika. Međutim, kod vulnerabilnih ispitanika koji su imali zadatak mirovanja došlo je i do blagog povišenja negativnog afekta, koje nije registrovano u grupi sa indukcijom afekta bez obzira na vulnerabilnost. Dobijeni rezultati daju delimičnu potvrdu kognitivnim, ali i neurobiološkim modelima.

show abstract

Specificity of cognitive biases in patients with current depression and remitted depression and in patients with asthma

Cited by 121 publications

References 56 publications

The combined cognitive bias hypothesis in depression

The combined cognitive bias hypothesis in depression

Systematic review of the neural basis of social cognition in patients with mood disorders

Situacioni Činioci Afektivnog Stanja – Afektivne Promene Tokom Mirovanja I Indukcije Afekta

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About