2012
DOI: 10.1099/ijs.0.036327-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sphingobacterium lactis sp. nov. and Sphingobacterium alimentarium sp. nov., isolated from raw milk and a dairy environment

Abstract: Four non-fermenting, rod-shaped, Gram-staining-negative bacterial strains, designated WCC 4512 T , WS 4555, WCC 4521 T and WS 4556, were isolated from raw milk and the dairy environment. Phylogenetic analyses based on 16S rRNA and groEL gene sequences demonstrated the affiliation of the four strains to two distinct clusters within the class Sphingobacteriia, phylum 'Bacteroidetes'. Strains WCC 4512 T and WS 4555 showed the highest 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity to the type strain of S. daejeonense (97.3 and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

2
29
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
2
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Besides, Sphingobacterium spp. has been isolated from different habitats, including raw cow and yak milk [37][38][39]. Massilia spp.…”
Section: Analysis Of Bacterial Diversitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides, Sphingobacterium spp. has been isolated from different habitats, including raw cow and yak milk [37][38][39]. Massilia spp.…”
Section: Analysis Of Bacterial Diversitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Members of the genus Sphingobacterium have been isolated from clinical materials, raw milk, lichen, fresh leaves, water, soil, compost, activated sludge and soybean plants. Currently, the genus Sphingobacterium includes 32 species with validly published names: S. multivorum, S. mizutaii and the type species, S. spiritivorum (Yabuuchi et al, 1983); S. faecium and S. thalpophilum (Takeuchi &Yokota, 1992); S. daejeonense (Kim et al, 2006); S. composti ; S. canadense (Mehnaz et al, 2007); S. siyangense (Liu et al, 2008); S. kitahiroshimense (Matsuyama et al, 2008); S. anhuiense (Wei et al, 2008); S. bambusae (Duan et al, 2009); S. shayense (He et al, 2010); S. kyonggiense (Choi & Lee, 2012); S. alimentarium and S. lactis (Schmidt et al, 2012); S. detergens (Marqués et al, 2012); S. nematocida (Liu et al, 2012); S. wenxiniae (Zhang et al, 2012); S. caeni (Sun et al, 2013); S. changzhouense (Liu et al, 2013); S. cladoniae (Lee et al, 2013); S. hotanense (Xiao et al, 2013); S. psychroaquaticum (Albert et al, 2013); S. thermophilum (Yabe et al, 2013); S. arenae (Jiang et al, 2014); S. ginsenosidimutans (Son et al, 2013) S. paludis (Feng et al, 2014); S. gobiense (Zhao et al, 2014); and S. mucilaginosum (Du et al, 2015).…”
Section: T )mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the time of writing, the genus Sphingobacterium contains 32 species with validly published names including Flavobacterium mizutaii , which is now generally accepted to belong to the genus Sphingobacterium as Sphingobacterium mizutaii (Choi & Lee, 2012). These species of the genus Sphingobacterium were mostly isolated from soil, clinical specimens, compost, plants, raw milk, sludge and lake water (Albert et al , 2013; Peng et al , 2014; Schmidt et al , 2012; Sun et al , 2013; Yabuuchi et al , 1983). Most species of the genus Sphingobacterium contain iso-C 15 : 0 , C 16 : 1 ω7 c , C 16 : 0 and C 17 : 0 3-OH as the main fatty acids (Feng et al , 2014; Liu et al , 2008).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%