1997
DOI: 10.1615/interjfluidmechres.v24.i1-3.250
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spray Break-Up Process of Diesel Fuel Investigated Close to the Nozzle

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The thickness of the investigated spray volume is limited in depth by the laser light sheet (thickness is <500 µm) and especially by the focal depth of the optics (80 µm). In the studies by Badock et al, 13 Fath et al, 26 Heimgärtner and Leipertz 27 and Schmitz et al, 28 the capability of this technique is shown for the identification of microscopic spray structures such as ligaments, clusters, cavities and liquid core. Limitations are unpredictable scattering properties due to multiple scattering at the rough stochastic interface of the spray, which might cause a milky haze in front of the observed plane.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The thickness of the investigated spray volume is limited in depth by the laser light sheet (thickness is <500 µm) and especially by the focal depth of the optics (80 µm). In the studies by Badock et al, 13 Fath et al, 26 Heimgärtner and Leipertz 27 and Schmitz et al, 28 the capability of this technique is shown for the identification of microscopic spray structures such as ligaments, clusters, cavities and liquid core. Limitations are unpredictable scattering properties due to multiple scattering at the rough stochastic interface of the spray, which might cause a milky haze in front of the observed plane.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to simulate the disintegration of the liquid jet, it is necessary to determine which is the driving process. Based on the experimental results of Fath et al [26], we assume that, within a distance of 400 µm from the nozzle exit, cavitation and turbulence are competing and atomization is driven by the process that presents the lower atomization characteristic time scale. Beyond that distance, the atomization is assumed to be controlled by turbulence only.…”
Section: Numerical Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cavitationinduced atomization submodel is based on a modified version of that proposed by Arcoumanis et al [32] and tries to give an estimation of the cavitation-induced atomization characteristic time. Based on the experimental results of Fath et al [33], it is assumed that, within a distance of 400 m from the nozzle exit, cavitation and turbulence are competing and atomization is driven by the process that presents the lower atomization characteristic time scale. Beyond that distance, the atomization is supposed to be controlled by turbulence only.…”
Section: Atomizationmentioning
confidence: 99%