2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2014.10.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stable growth of ruthenium doped InP at the current blocking layer for buried-heterostructure lasers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 11 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It was previously reported that the parasitic capacitance can be decreased by inserting a thick Fe-doped semi-insulating InP layer (si-InP) (i.e., si-(1 μm thick)/n-InP, si-(1 μm thick)/n-/si-(1.5 μm thick)/n-InP, and p-/n-/si-(1.5 μm thick)/n-InP) [8]. However, the use of an Fe-doped si-InP layer increases the leakage current outside the active region because of the strong inter-diffusion with p-type dopants [9,10]; moreover, the insertion of an si-InP layer between the n-InP layers requires a change in the reactor during the growth of the current blocking layers, which in turn increases the fabrication complexity and cost.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was previously reported that the parasitic capacitance can be decreased by inserting a thick Fe-doped semi-insulating InP layer (si-InP) (i.e., si-(1 μm thick)/n-InP, si-(1 μm thick)/n-/si-(1.5 μm thick)/n-InP, and p-/n-/si-(1.5 μm thick)/n-InP) [8]. However, the use of an Fe-doped si-InP layer increases the leakage current outside the active region because of the strong inter-diffusion with p-type dopants [9,10]; moreover, the insertion of an si-InP layer between the n-InP layers requires a change in the reactor during the growth of the current blocking layers, which in turn increases the fabrication complexity and cost.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%