State of urgency: Surveillance, power, and algorithms in France’s state of emergency

Abstract

The recent terrorist attacks and ongoing state of emergency in France have brought questions of police surveillance into the public spotlight, making it increasingly important to understand how police attain data from citizens. Since 2005, the French police have been using IBM's computer program, i2 Analyst's Notebook, to aggregate information and craft criminal narratives. This technology serves to quickly connect suspects with crimes, looking for as many associations as possible, ranking and visualizing them based on level of importance. Recently, surveillance and state power have been theorized as having shifted to a posthegemonic, order. Drawing from literature on power, surveillance, and identity, this paper considers the various ways that algorithms can impact policing under a state of emergency by comparing the technical protocol of i2 Analyst's Notebook with the administrative protocol of the French state. Using i2 Analyst's Notebook as an example, this paper argues that posthegemonic theories of power have their place in determining how algorithms can be used for surveillance, but that they cannot completely explain their use under the state of emergency.

O direito à privacidade no tempo do big data: narrativas profissionais na União Europeia

“…Potenciado pela sofisticação tecnológica, criou uma relação humano-algoritmo que modelou a forma como os cidadãos são abordados e identificados (LYON, 2014;WOOD;BALL, 2006). Por via de softwares, o comportamento humano é transformado em algoritmos e, sob um número, é reproduzido graficamente para ser codificado e analisado (MATZNER, 2016;WOOD;BALL, 2006;KUBLER, 2017;YURI;REGINA, 2018).…”

“…Urge debater as repercussões ligadas à submersão humana nesta sociedade tecnológica e digital (TAYLOR, 2017;BOYD;CRAWFORD, 2012;WOOD;BALL, 2006) e as consequências ligadas a esta realidade. Apesar de existirem estudos que buscaram desmistificar tendências legislativas, por via da análise de documentos legais e que buscam dar resposta aos desafios ao direito à privacidade levantados pelo Big Data (DREWER; MILADINOVA, 2017;GONÇALVES, 2017;KUBLER, 2017;MANTELERO, 2017), existe um vazio científico no que toca à análise de discursos de atores profissionais que trabalhem no meio da partilha de dados. O presente artigo apresenta dados inovadores que têm por base a análise de narrativas sobre o potencial de Big Data e as consequências sociais (im)previstas da sua expansão (NEIVA, 2019).…”

“…Neste debate contemporâneo, a par da percepção de que a tecnologia está em desenvolvimento, os participantes reconhecem que isso pode potenciar e aumentar a colisão com direitos, liberdades e garantias fundamentais dos cidadãos, como é ilustrativo no seguinte extrato: O debate está instaurado e a necessidade de equilibrar os dois pratos da balança é cada vez mais sentida. Apesar dos estudos existentes evidenciarem as evoluções legislativas e as transformações legais que esta técnica desencadeou (DREWER; MILADINOVA, 2017;GONÇALVES, 2017;KUBLER, 2017;MANTELERO, 2017;PÚBLICO, 2018), este artigo indica que as representações profissionais de Big Data se direcionam no sentido oposto. Os profissionais entrevistados percepcionam esta realidade como um campo ainda por regulamentar.…”

Recalibration in counting and accounting practices: Dealing with algorithmic output in public and private

“…As an algorithm is 'a process or set of rules to be followed in calculations or other problemsolving operations, especially by a computer' (New Oxford American Dictionary), one may be tempted to try and locate the specific 'process or set of rules' to interrogate it. Yet, as algorithms are constantly changing (see Kubler, 2017;Seaver, 2013), focussing too much on the algorithm itself can be akin to a dog chasing its own tail. The focus here is to disentangle the various aspects of decision-making in relation to algorithmic outputs, and this is where Paul Dourish's (2016) proposal is a useful starting point (cf.…”

Can a virus undermine human rights?

“…3 Many governments could take advantage of tracking technologies, artificial intelligence, and robotics to expand invasive surveillance. 4 Governments will most likely seek to watch over the intimate life of the public, to predict and monitor their behaviours and movements. These practices could morph into the panoptic surveillance of the lives of citizens.…”