2016
DOI: 10.1007/s13364-016-0279-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Status assessment of Eurasian lynx in Latvia linking genetics and demography—a growing population or a source–sink process?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, there is a relatively consistent availability of roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) and other ungulate species in the HM region likely providing suitable conditions for the establishment and growth of a stable lynx population. Lynx are more sensitive to changes in habitats and prey abundance than other large carnivores, making both forest cover and availability of prey important factors in determining the likelihood of survival (Bagrade et al 2016;Schmidt et al 2011). This rapid demographic and spatial expansion confirms that reintroduction of captive born lynx is possible, which has important consequences for future reintroduction planning.…”
Section: Population Growth and Expansionmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Second, there is a relatively consistent availability of roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) and other ungulate species in the HM region likely providing suitable conditions for the establishment and growth of a stable lynx population. Lynx are more sensitive to changes in habitats and prey abundance than other large carnivores, making both forest cover and availability of prey important factors in determining the likelihood of survival (Bagrade et al 2016;Schmidt et al 2011). This rapid demographic and spatial expansion confirms that reintroduction of captive born lynx is possible, which has important consequences for future reintroduction planning.…”
Section: Population Growth and Expansionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…This isolation is a major threat to the long-term viability of reintroduced lynx populations (Molinari-Jobin et al 2010). While there is considerable data on the genetic structure of autochtonous lynx populations in Europe including phylogeographic assessments (Gugolz et al 2008;Ratkiewicz et al 2012;Sindičić et al 2013a;Rodríguez-Varela et al 2016), Europe-wide population characterization (Rueness et al 2014;Ratkiewicz et al 2014;Schmidt et al 2011), fine-scale population structure (Sindičić et al 2013a;Bagrade et al 2016;Schmidt et al 2016;Holmala et al 2018) and non-invasive genetic monitoring (Davoli et al 2013;Krojerová-Prokešová et al 2018;Hollerbach et al 2018), such genetic assessment of reintroduced lynx populations is sparse (Bull et al 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Female lynx seem to disperse less frequently and for shorter distances than males, even though male-biased dispersal was not confirmed in some areas (Zimmermann et al 2005(Zimmermann et al , 2007Herrero et al 2020). Except for Northern Europe (Fennoscandia, Baltic states), where dispersal distances are generally longer (Samelius et al 2012;Bagrade et al 2016;Herrero et al 2020), there seem to be no published records about female dispersal longer than 100 km (see more details given in the supplementary material of the review of Bartoń et al (2019)). The reluctance of female lynx to disperse over longer distances, particularly in fragmented landscapes, thus reduces the species ability to colonise new areas (Port et al 2020).…”
Section: Factors Affecting Dispersalmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Since 1971, 15 reintroductions across eight European countries have involved over 170 Eurasian lynx individuals, but only five of these attempts are considered to be successful (Linnell et al, 2009). As a result, important lessons have been learnt, and a significant body of knowledge about the species' ecology, demography (Breitenmoser-Würsten et al, 2007;Bagrade et al, 2016;Jȩdrzejewski et al, 1996), dispersal behaviour (Samelius et al, 2012;Schmidt, 1998;Zimmermann et al, 2005), habitat requirements and use (Belotti et al, 2013;Filla et al, 2017;Podgórski et al, 2008;Rozylowicz et al, 2010;Zimmermann et al, 2007b) has been amassed. However, there is a particular need for tools that enable the synthesis of this knowledge and incorporate recent progress in dispersal ecology theory, in order to provide more reliable assessments of landscape suitability and inter-patch connectivity, and to increase the probability of future reintroduction successes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%