2019
DOI: 10.3389/fmars.2019.00608
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Storm-Induced Predator-Prey Decoupling Promotes Springtime Accumulation of North Atlantic Phytoplankton

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
50
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
3
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…perpendicular distances between parallel tangents across opposite sides of the particle, made at 5 • each between −90 • and +90 • . Water for plankton community analyses was collected from a depth of 5 m using a Niskin rosette with 10 L bottles equipped with a SBE911plus (Seabird Electronics) CTD (Conductivity, Temperature and Depth) profiler and gently strained through a 200 µm mesh (see Morison et al, 2019). Particle counts and size distribution were analyzed onboard using a Coulter Counter Model III, following the protocol described above for the analysis of mono-specific laboratory cultures.…”
Section: Flowcammentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…perpendicular distances between parallel tangents across opposite sides of the particle, made at 5 • each between −90 • and +90 • . Water for plankton community analyses was collected from a depth of 5 m using a Niskin rosette with 10 L bottles equipped with a SBE911plus (Seabird Electronics) CTD (Conductivity, Temperature and Depth) profiler and gently strained through a 200 µm mesh (see Morison et al, 2019). Particle counts and size distribution were analyzed onboard using a Coulter Counter Model III, following the protocol described above for the analysis of mono-specific laboratory cultures.…”
Section: Flowcammentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Particle counts and size distribution were analyzed onboard using a Coulter Counter Model III, following the protocol described above for the analysis of mono-specific laboratory cultures. Chl a analysis followed the procedure regularly used by our laboratory for Chl a extraction (e.g., Morison et al, 2019). In brief, Chl a concentration was determined from triplicate 180 ml subsamples taken from the same Niskin bottle after filtration on GF/F filters and extraction followed Graff and Rynearson (2011), except that extraction took place in the dark at room temperature for 12 h in 96% ethanol (Jespersen and Christoffersen, 1987).…”
Section: Flowcammentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The two-point method has been recognized as a reliable alternative to the traditional dilution series (Chen, 2015;Morison & Menden-Deuer, 2017) and has been used successfully in many studies (e.g., Worden & Binder, 2003;Strom & Fredrickson, 2008;Landry et al, 2008;Landry et al, 2009;Landry et al, 2011;Lawrence & Menden-Deuer, 2012;Menden-Deuer, Lawrence & Franzè, 2018). Methods are presented in detail in a companion paper (Morison et al, 2019). In brief, the two dilutions used were 100% and 20% <200 µm WSW.…”
Section: Experimental Set-upmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The photoacclimation process can introduce artifacts in the estimation of phytoplankton growth rates due to changes in phytoplankton cells' pigment content and therefore in the Chl a to carbon ratio in response to a change of light (Ross et al, 2011). To avoid such artifacts, a photoacclimation index (Phi) was estimated following Gutiérrez-Rodríguez et al (2010), Gutierrez-Rodriguez et al, (2011) and Morison et al (2019), using flow cytometry (FC) data obtained from 200 µL aliquots of <40 µm screened WSW analyzed live on a Guava R easyCyte Flow Cytometer. FC data were collected as previously described in Morison et al (2019).…”
Section: Rate Estimatesmentioning
confidence: 99%