2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.tsf.2010.09.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural and electrical properties of thin Ho2O3 gate dielectrics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
12
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
12
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, the formation of sub‐stoichiometric Ho 2 O 3 also reinforced the charge trapping sites in the dielectric/IL interface. Comparing with previous literature the lowest average interface trap density, D it ~9.39 × 10 13 eV −1 cm −2 (at mid E C − E = 0.2 eV) in this work for 10 minutes sample value is higher than the reported 31 post annealed Ho 2 O 3 /Si interface D it ~3.00 × 10 11 eV −1 cm −2 . However, a lower Q eff ~8.80 × 10 12 cm −2 , Q it ~2.93 × 10 12 cm −2 , D it ~10 13 eV −1 cm −2 (at mid E C − E = 0.2 eV) and D total ~1.97 × 10 13 cm −2 has been acquired in our work in counter to thermally oxidized Sm 2 O 3 /Si interface 69 [ Q eff ~2.81 × 10 13 cm −2 , Q it ~5.56 × 10 12 cm −2 , D it ~10 14 eV −1 cm −2 (at mid E C ‐ E = 0.2 eV) and D total ~7.30 × 10 13 cm −2 ].…”
Section: Physical and Electrical Characterizationcontrasting
confidence: 52%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In addition, the formation of sub‐stoichiometric Ho 2 O 3 also reinforced the charge trapping sites in the dielectric/IL interface. Comparing with previous literature the lowest average interface trap density, D it ~9.39 × 10 13 eV −1 cm −2 (at mid E C − E = 0.2 eV) in this work for 10 minutes sample value is higher than the reported 31 post annealed Ho 2 O 3 /Si interface D it ~3.00 × 10 11 eV −1 cm −2 . However, a lower Q eff ~8.80 × 10 12 cm −2 , Q it ~2.93 × 10 12 cm −2 , D it ~10 13 eV −1 cm −2 (at mid E C − E = 0.2 eV) and D total ~1.97 × 10 13 cm −2 has been acquired in our work in counter to thermally oxidized Sm 2 O 3 /Si interface 69 [ Q eff ~2.81 × 10 13 cm −2 , Q it ~5.56 × 10 12 cm −2 , D it ~10 14 eV −1 cm −2 (at mid E C ‐ E = 0.2 eV) and D total ~7.30 × 10 13 cm −2 ].…”
Section: Physical and Electrical Characterizationcontrasting
confidence: 52%
“…Figure6depicts the deconvoluted peaks of Ho 4d narrow scan for various oxidation/nitridation durations 5, 10, 15, and 20 minutes. The reference peak position of Ho 2 O 3 in the Ho 4d spectra was reported at 161.8 eV 31,46. It is clearly visible that the centroid peak of Ho 4d shifts negatively towards the lower binding energy by 1.07, 0.66, 0.87, and1.17 eV, respectively for 5, 10, 15, and 20 minutes with respect to the reference position of Ho 2 O 3 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…17,18 Holmium oxide (Ho 2 O 3 ) lm has been studied for gate dielectric applications due to its high k value, wide bandgap energy, high breakdown eld, and low leakage current. [19][20][21][22] Exposure to air, however, causes hygroscopic lanthanide oxides to react with moisture to form hydroxides, 23 causing lower values of k. The incorporation of Ti or TiO 2 lms into RE oxides increases their stability toward moisture. 24 van Dover 25 also demonstrated that the Ti adding RE oxide exhibited excellent electrical performance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%