2010
DOI: 10.1021/jz100209h
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Substrate Hybridization and Rippling of Graphene Evidenced by Near-Edge X-ray Absorption Fine Structure Spectroscopy

Abstract: Interfacial interactions at graphene/metal and graphene/dielectric interfaces are likely to profoundly influence the electronic structure of graphene. We present here the first angle-resolved near-edge X-ray absorption fine structure (NEXAFS) spectroscopy study of single-and bilayered graphene grown by chemical vapor deposition on Cu and Ni substrates. The spectra indicate the presence of new electronic states in the conduction band derived from hybridization of the C-π network with Cu and Ni d-orbitals. In co… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

8
79
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(87 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
(140 reference statements)
8
79
0
Order By: Relevance
“…CVD growth on Cu provides better homogeneity and control over the number of graphene layers and consequently these samples have been analysed further in the STXM measurements. As we have shown in previous work, the π*feature of graphene on metal foil substrates is split because of the substrate hybridization likely with Cu/Ni d z 2 orbitals 9 . The strength of such interfacial bonding, as evidenced by splitting of the π*feature in Supplementary Figure S6 (Supplementary Information), is greater for the graphene/Ni interface as compared with graphene grown on Cu.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 56%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…CVD growth on Cu provides better homogeneity and control over the number of graphene layers and consequently these samples have been analysed further in the STXM measurements. As we have shown in previous work, the π*feature of graphene on metal foil substrates is split because of the substrate hybridization likely with Cu/Ni d z 2 orbitals 9 . The strength of such interfacial bonding, as evidenced by splitting of the π*feature in Supplementary Figure S6 (Supplementary Information), is greater for the graphene/Ni interface as compared with graphene grown on Cu.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 56%
“…Knowledge of such phenomena, and understanding band structure alterations originating from the formation of localized electronic domains are imperative to facilitate the integration of graphene within commercial electronics, for applications ranging from interconnects to high electron mobility transistors 1,[6][7][8] . The rippling and doping of discrete regions of the graphene lattice is a consequence of the one-atom-thick 2D nature of this material, which being uniquely composed of atoms that reside entirely on the surface is highly susceptible to interactions at interfaces and the influence of adventitious impurities that can locally perturb the electronic structure 9,10 . Doping and adsorbates are somewhat inevitable as a result of typical processing protocols including wet and dry transfer techniques ubiquitous in the transfer of chemical vapour deposition (CVD)-grown graphene; chemical etching required for removal of Si, Cu, and Ni substrates; and solvent washes used to clean residue from graphene surfaces or for lithographic patterning.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is important to note that this analysis could not be reliably applied to molecular coverages less than half a monolayer due to difficulties in resolving the molecular NEXAFS signal from the large graphene background. NEXAFS and XPS also allow for the direct detection of graphene-adsorbate (or substrate) hybridization 40 . No such hybridization of the graphene p* orbital was observed after nucleobase deposition on our samples, confirming that the nucleobase-graphene interaction is moderated only by van der Waals forces.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This asymmetry suggests again that the as-deposited diffusing molecule is three-dimensional since the contribution to the LUMO of the C1s electrons of carbon atoms in two different positions is geometrically different. In previous literature, the less intense peaks B (286.4 eV), C (287.3 eV), D (288.0 eV) and E (289.4 eV) have been assigned differently, with peaks B-D often associated with transitions of the C1s electrons into σ* orbitals located on C-H bonds 21,23,24,[26][27][28] with an admixture of Rydberg 3s states, 29,30 while peak E can be a signature of the second π* resonance in simple aromatic hydrocarbons 31,21 . For all these features we observe an anisotropy corresponding to a perpendicular bond.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%